Post by Teddy Bear on Jun 8, 2011 21:54:33 GMT
At the beginning of the year two different newspaper articles covered how by not properly, or purposefully avoiding stating who is behind certain crimes, when there is a common thread, it enables the perpetrators to continue.
Both articles were referring to the actions by certain Muslims, although in different contexts. One by Nick Cohen in the Observer about how the BBC ignores the extremist Islamic mindset in its overall coverage, which we posted here at the time. The other in the Daily Mail, by coincidence on the same day, was about Top detective blasts 'culture of silence' that allows Asian sex gangs to groom white girls... because police and social services fear being branded racist
The statistics quoted in this article were given thus:
The subject today is one we've observed many times and commented on here, how the BBC avoid using mentioning the Muslim connection on any story that would have negative connotations. It relates quite directly to the second article linked to above as it concerns a gang who were found guilty of preying on young girls and grooming them for sex and prostitution.
The BBC covered today Rochdale child 'prostitution ring' charges. They are quite clear on giving us the names and street addresses of these men, and it's only from the names that we know just who these men are. Not even Asian or Pakistani is used in their description, or anywhere in the article.
So what's in a name?
The story goes on to tell us this:
'...handed over to the UK Border agency' eh??? If he was Israeli would we be told that fact? If they all were Israelis or Catholics would we be told that fact?
You bet!
The BBC are not afraid of being considered racist - just shit scared of Muslims.
Both articles were referring to the actions by certain Muslims, although in different contexts. One by Nick Cohen in the Observer about how the BBC ignores the extremist Islamic mindset in its overall coverage, which we posted here at the time. The other in the Daily Mail, by coincidence on the same day, was about Top detective blasts 'culture of silence' that allows Asian sex gangs to groom white girls... because police and social services fear being branded racist
The statistics quoted in this article were given thus:
Charities and agencies working in conjunction with the police to help victims of sexual abuse in such cases have publicly denied there is a link between ethnicity and the on-street grooming of young girls by gangs and pimps.
But researchers identified 17 court prosecutions since 1997, 14 of them in the past three years, involving the on-street grooming of girls aged 11 to 16 by groups of men.
The victims came from 13 towns and cities and in each case two or more men were convicted of offences.
In total, 56 people, with an average age of 28, were found guilty of crimes including rape, child abduction, indecent assault and sex with a child.
Three of the 56 were white, 53 were Asian. Of those, 50 were Muslim and a majority were members of the British Pakistani community.
Those convicted allegedly represent only a small proportion of what one detective called a ‘tidal wave’ of offending in Yorkshire, Lancashire, Greater Manchester and the Midlands.
The subject today is one we've observed many times and commented on here, how the BBC avoid using mentioning the Muslim connection on any story that would have negative connotations. It relates quite directly to the second article linked to above as it concerns a gang who were found guilty of preying on young girls and grooming them for sex and prostitution.
The BBC covered today Rochdale child 'prostitution ring' charges. They are quite clear on giving us the names and street addresses of these men, and it's only from the names that we know just who these men are. Not even Asian or Pakistani is used in their description, or anywhere in the article.
So what's in a name?
The charged men are:
* Abdul Rauf, 42, of Darley Road, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, sexual activity and paying for the sexual services of a child and trafficking a child within the UK
* Mohammed Ikhlaq, 41 of Cloverhall Crescent, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16
* Adil Khan, 41, of Oswald Street, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, two offences of sexual activity, and trafficking a child within the UK
* Liaquat Shah, 41, of Kensington Street, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16 and two counts of rape
* Mohammed Sajid, 34, of Jepheys Street, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with a girl under 16, three offences of sexual activity and attempting to pay for the sexual services of a child
* Qamar Shahzad, 29, of Tweedale Street, Freehold, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16 and rape
* Mohammed Amin, 44, of Falinge Road, Falinge, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, sexual assault and sexual activity
* Abdul Aziz, 40, of Armstrong Hurst Close, Rochdale, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, trafficking girls, rape and controlling child prostitution
The story goes on to tell us this:
Meanwhile, three men aged between 34 and 43 answered bail on Tuesday and were re-bailed to later dates.
A further five men are due to answer bail on 21 June 2011.
Five other men have been released without charge while three more are not on bail.
Police said one man had been handed over to the UK Border Agency.
Hamid Safi, 21, of Kensington Street, Rochdale, failed to answer bail and is now wanted by police.
'...handed over to the UK Border agency' eh??? If he was Israeli would we be told that fact? If they all were Israelis or Catholics would we be told that fact?
You bet!
The BBC are not afraid of being considered racist - just shit scared of Muslims.