Post by Teddy Bear on Oct 22, 2011 22:44:42 GMT
In this recent article by the BBC on the subject; Muammar Gaddafi's death: NTC commander speaks, but is posted on the Yahoo page by the BBC as New light shed on Gaddafi death, it's like the BBC want to touch all the bases for all the causes they now support, consequently one is left more confused as to what the facts really are. For example,
Open and transparent manner? I thought the pictures shown in umpteen you-tube videos made it quite clear, but suddenly those responsible for what happened to Gaddafi want to appear civilised.
We also get this;
Sounds like it might have been Lee Harvey Oswald.
Gaddafi's body is being kept in a meat storage locker, and a 'full investigation' can be carried out as long as Islamic burial rules are respected. 'It's not how you kill 'em, it's how you bury 'em that counts'.
What happens to the meat locker?
Now as I recall in previous BBC articles on this conflict there were hundreds of thousands of Gaddafi supporters, and we all know how the BBC use carefully picked 'sources' to justify a particular line - so we get this
So presumably these 'correspondents' interviewed all the Libyans. And of course we're expected to believe that any who disagreed with Gaddafi's humiliating end are going to voice their disapproval now.
In an exclusive BBC interview, Mr Oweib said: "I didn't see who killed, which weapon killed Gaddafi." He added that some of his fighters had wanted to shoot the colonel, but that he had sought to keep him alive.
After Col Gaddafi collapsed, Mr Oweib said, he drove him to a field hospital where he was pronounced dead. "I tried to save his life but I couldn't," the commander said.
Questions have been mounting about the death. Video footage suggests he was dragged through the streets.
The US has called on officials to give an account in an "open and transparent manner". Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the "way his death happened poses an entire number of questions".
Mr Lavrov called for a full investigation, echoing a similar call by UN Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay.
Open and transparent manner? I thought the pictures shown in umpteen you-tube videos made it quite clear, but suddenly those responsible for what happened to Gaddafi want to appear civilised.
We also get this;
He said it was impossible to tell who had fired the fatal bullet.
Meanwhile confusion has emerged over whether a full post-mortem had been performed on Col Gaddafi.
His body - and that of his son Mutassim, who was also killed on Thursday - have been placed in a meat storage facility in the city of Misrata.
The foreign affairs spokesman of Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC), Ahmed Gebreel, told the BBC the post-mortem was carried out on Saturday.
However a senior health official within the NTC, Nagy Barakat, said there was no need for such an examination as the cause of death had emerged from a pathologist's report.
Mr Jibril added that it would be "absolutely OK" to carry out a full investigation under international supervision, as long as Islamic burial rules were respected.
Sounds like it might have been Lee Harvey Oswald.
Gaddafi's body is being kept in a meat storage locker, and a 'full investigation' can be carried out as long as Islamic burial rules are respected. 'It's not how you kill 'em, it's how you bury 'em that counts'.
The burial has been delayed, amid uncertainty about what to do with the remains.
It is unclear whether the ex-leader will be buried in Misrata, in his hometown of Sirte, or elsewhere.
Officials from the NTC have said they want a secret burial to prevent any grave being turned into a shrine.
What happens to the meat locker?
Now as I recall in previous BBC articles on this conflict there were hundreds of thousands of Gaddafi supporters, and we all know how the BBC use carefully picked 'sources' to justify a particular line - so we get this
Correspondents say few Libyans are worried about the manner of their former dictator's humiliating end, which has been celebrated across the country.
So presumably these 'correspondents' interviewed all the Libyans. And of course we're expected to believe that any who disagreed with Gaddafi's humiliating end are going to voice their disapproval now.