|
Post by dance2drop on May 30, 2014 8:20:02 GMT
Again, last nights prog was a shambles. At least however DD came to some who voted UKIP for their views which makes a change.
However, what were the Beeb thinking of having that arse of a football player on there. How rude and offensive was he ? I had heard that he had done a stretch. Beeb should be ashamed of themselves. As one of the texters on QT said - what next on the programme "Jack the Ripper" ! The lady UKIP member however stood her ground and I thought she was very good.
Another thing, as there have been a number of (can I say it) coloured gentleman who have voted UKIP - how can this party be racist as all the other main parties claim.
By slagging off and smearing the UKIP in the last few weeks prior to the European elections did them no good. What a result was that !
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on May 30, 2014 14:49:01 GMT
It was pure evil, with the only saving grace that any half intelligent person would have seen through it. 32 minutes of a 60 minute programme trying to demonize UKIP. ( Available to be seen again for the next 12 months here) Even the Conservative representative made himself look like an absolute arrogant buffoon, especially with his statement that 'they (the present parties) were the real grown-ups'. UKIP needs to start recounting how some of these 'grown-up' MPs have behaved, with a whole host of cheating, lying, stealing, incidents. As for the footballer, Joey Barton, I felt with him the BBC had reached a new low. I looked up his history - and here's an excerpt: One only needs to read his views on Israel to see just how ignorant this lout is, but one will get an idea as to why he might be attractive for the BBC. I knew I would find a negative view expressed by him on Israel when I heard him blaming (@43mins into the programme) American Jews for being responsible for the invasion of Iraq. Dimbleby immediately shifted the subject rather than confront this moron. I want the British public to remember that they are forced to pay for this evil rubbish.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on May 30, 2014 15:39:09 GMT
I see many more have felt the BBC reached a new low.
|
|
|
Post by steevo on May 31, 2014 3:35:08 GMT
Howdy Teddy, I've been busy with some big changes and took some time off from Internet communication. Hope you're well...
I have a couple questions? (Even the Conservative representative...) It seems I've read more frequently the Tories being referred as the "Conservative" (capital C) party. Have I missed something? I just don't remember the automatic: Tory = Conservative.
Also, what do you think the chances are the BBC will not be supported by the tax payer? I ask because I'm wondering if they've dodged the proverbial bullet?
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on May 31, 2014 17:38:51 GMT
Steevo Great to see you - been missing you. Hope whatever changes you've been involved in have gone well. Tory and Conservative are interchangeable words for the same party. Just looking it up I see Tory predates Conservative. I always thought of Tory as a nickname for a member of the Conservative party. Regarding your final question - jury's out If the government makes an ethical and moral decision then they will privatise the BBC. Could you make a prediction about whether a modern Western government will be ethical and moral? I'm certainly a sceptic based on much of their mealy mouthed record. If they believe it will serve their own purpose to maintain the fraud that is the BBC then they'll keep it going. I would say in that case, down the road there's going to be a revolution. More and more people are getting sick of the status quo. The UKIP support was a good indication of that.
|
|
|
Post by steevo on May 31, 2014 20:18:02 GMT
Yeah it's just sickening. I hope you're right and enough people revolt to force real "change". I'd like to say more but it's probably not that wise. But Jefferson said: The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on May 31, 2014 20:59:24 GMT
The downside to it is that the reluctance of the PC mindset to properly engage, and mostly prohibit debate, means that there will be radicals to the other extreme. Good balance seems only to occur for a brief time while the see-saw goes from one side to the other, instead of being maintained as the status quo.
|
|
|
Post by steevo on Jun 1, 2014 3:12:48 GMT
Well to change the subject without involving much detail, I'm now living alone and looking at a future I suppose I knew could happen any time without notice because I know that's life. I've recently sold a home with many beloved memories and have moved from our west coast of Washington state to the east and North Carolina where today I put a down payment on a new home and hope to move in by the 10th of June. It's funny because I figured the previous one had about 1400 square feet and I would only need a little over half that now, but I got one that's actually a little more though a lot less expensive (I'm sure it's fate). It seems the large interior will give me a sense of space or freedom I can better maintain sanity. I can hear the birds better at this place too and walk around inside in the raw. Anyway I'm glad to be able to say hi to you again. If there's one consolation for the BBC to continue so will old Teddy Bear, though I do wonder
|
|
|
Post by charmbrights on Jun 1, 2014 7:48:38 GMT
Actually, I thought there was some considerable truth in Barton's statement, "You won seats in the European Parliament that nobody really cares about." The truth of this statement is visible in the fact that the UK's representatives have less than 10% of the seats in it and the majority of the rest are basically pushing for a dirigiste combined Fourth Reich and Fifth Republic.
Easily the overall winners in the UK at this election were the DCP with well over 60% and almost twice as many voters as all the other parties put together.
Also criticising UKIP for having no domestic policies (or worse, inventing such policies and then decrying them) was really silly - this was not a domestic election; it was a EUROPEAN parliament election.
PS DCP = "Don't Care Party".
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Jun 1, 2014 19:36:53 GMT
Steevo - I can well understand that this period would be somewhat 'traumatic' for most and I wish you the very best of transition into your new home and surroundings. I hope the new beginnings that come your way in time makes everything more positive than can ever have been otherwise. As you know - you're always welcome to PM me, and whatever happens we'll always keep in touch. I was actually thinking today about what if the government did privatise the BBC. It would be tempting to record the changes that the BBC would be forced to make, or else monitor their downfall - like chronicling karma in action. Would be hard not to gloat though. While I could think we've earned it, I want to avoid feeding a negative mindset within myself. Sure would be a time to rejoice though.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Jun 1, 2014 20:24:50 GMT
Actually, I thought there was some considerable truth in Barton's statement, " You won seats in the European Parliament that nobody really cares about." The truth of this statement is visible in the fact that the UK's representatives have less than 10% of the seats in it and the majority of the rest are basically pushing for a dirigiste combined Fourth Reich and Fifth Republic. I would say that 'if nobody really cared about it', why then did they take the trouble to go out and vote? People wanted to make a statement, and the likes of this idiot trying to dismiss it is precisely why so many of the public are looking elsewhere. It's reassuring to hear in a recent poll that many who voted for UKIP have already confirmed that they plan to do so again in the general election.
|
|
|
Post by steevo on Jun 3, 2014 1:55:08 GMT
Rejoicing should only be the beginning. I'd love to see enough of the "Conservative" party (egged on by UKIP of course) to have trials for treason with a lot of very rotten human beings, ending with life behind bars! If that happened here, from the President on down to the many influential media players, I'd be ecstatic.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Jun 3, 2014 22:59:30 GMT
The continuing pretence or self delusion of the left that their policies are motivated by higher human values, in defiance of reality and the chaos being created by them is creating more and more frustration and anger with those increasingly affected by them. It's like being imprisoned for a crime one didn't do, and watching the quality of one's life being eroded. It must eventually explode. Trials for treason? If they're lucky!
I see your president thinks accepting Hamas and working with them will achieve a positive solution. He betrays every value achieved by rational and intelligent human beings. But we've seen it coming for a long time. Only question is whether he does it purposefully, or he really is that ignorant?
|
|
|
Post by steevo on Jun 4, 2014 1:59:39 GMT
I don't think he's that ignorant, the fact is he doesn't like the Jews of Israel. But he's been flouting abuse of policy and authority without serious media questioning and accountability for some time. After all, he's not a Republican and most of our video media with the exception of Fox will excuse and keep his back. What he is, is largely indifferent to human life and if he thinks he can do something because of deep-seeded personal resentment, hate, and/or the immediate emotionalist image value, he will. Such as trading 5 of the most heinous Taliban terrorists in captivity for a man who may be a deserter, bypassing Congressional law. There's a lot he's done and in the midst trying now which will destroy the fabric and foundations of this country.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Jun 4, 2014 14:30:38 GMT
I was listening to Nick Ferrari on LBC Radio this morning and he was talking about how stupid Obama sounds now following the speech he gave praising Bergdahl, until it emerged that he was a traitor. Would you say those in the US who voted him in are beginning to think they were wrong?
|
|
|
Post by steevo on Jun 4, 2014 18:24:46 GMT
No, I wouldn't, at least for most. I would say they are much more stupid.
|
|
|
Post by charmbrights on Jun 8, 2014 15:35:15 GMT
I would say that 'if nobody really cared about it', why then did they take the trouble to go out and vote? ... By a majority of about 2 to 1 the UK's electorate did NOT vote. I rest my case.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Jun 8, 2014 20:34:22 GMT
The numbers in the UK who voted in the EU elections were about average for every one since 1979. So no surprise there. The unusual event was the following: So of those voting, over a quarter showed their preference for UKIP, the first time in history, and handed a clear message to the other parties. If you think that's unimportant and something that can be sneered at, as the other parties and their supporters pretend to do, that's fine.
|
|
|
Post by charmbrights on Jun 9, 2014 8:24:58 GMT
... So of those voting, over a quarter showed their preference for UKIP, the first time in history, and handed a clear message to the other parties. If you think that's unimportant and something that can be sneered at, as the other parties and their supporters pretend to do, that's fine. I was not sneering. I do think that when we have an election which is for the whole of the UK (i.e. General Election or European Election) the turnout can be used to assess the importance the electorate place in the election. Election % turnout since 1945 Year General Europeanx.1974 72.8 1979 76 32.35 1983 72.7 1984 32.57 1987 75.3 1989 36.37 1992 77.7 1994 36.37 1997 71.4 1999 24 2001 59.4 2004 38.52 2005 61.4 2009 34.7 2010 65.1 2014 34.19Source: House of Commons Research Papers 01/37, 01/54, 05/33 & 10/36 and www.europarl.europa.euI still claim that this shows that half of the population of the UK who normally vote in elections are not interested in the European Parliament. For the record I did vote, and my vote went to UKIP.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Jun 9, 2014 19:36:49 GMT
Good on ya I'm curious if you have ever voted before in the EU election or was this the first time, and if so if you have voted UKIP before? My feeling is that most people don't think there is much point in voting in the EU elections as regardless of who gets voted in nothing much seems to change. Orders come from Brussels and we follow them. I can understand that the other parties want to diminish what might be the consequences that this time the majority voted UKIP, and it creates some optimism for change in the future.
|
|
|
Post by charmbrights on Jun 10, 2014 7:11:42 GMT
... I'm curious if you have ever voted before in the EU election or was this the first time? ... I have voted in every EU election since I voted "NO" in 1975, and always for anti-Fourth Reich candidates/parties. ... and if so if you have voted UKIP before? ... That is complicated. I live in the People's Republic of South Wales where the choice is usually between Labour (of the Dennis Skinner, Bob Crowe, and Arthur Scargill variety) and Plaid Cymru so my voting is usually tactical. For the Assembly we have individual and party list votes where I can do whatever I fancy on the individual as the same man will get in whatever I do, but the party lists I take very seriously. In the local unitary authority the situation is such that when our local councillor died a little while ago his daughter stood as candidate (selected by the local Labour Party long before his death) and won by 900+ votes to 43, so there are rarely more than two candidates.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Jun 10, 2014 16:07:13 GMT
Thanks Charm.
You confirm that for many who voted for UKIP, it gave them the first opportunity to make a clear statement, regardless of how things changed on the ground for the time being. I would take some optimism from this, and the fact that the other parties are scared.
|
|
|
Post by charmbrights on Jun 11, 2014 8:03:51 GMT
Thanks Charm. You confirm that for many who voted for UKIP, it gave them the first opportunity to make a clear statement, regardless of how things changed on the ground for the time being. I would take some optimism from this, and the fact that the other parties are scared. I can only speak for myself - I have no way of knowing what motivates other voters.
|
|