Post by Teddy Bear on May 17, 2007 23:11:21 GMT
The latest article from Honest Reporting is how the media avoids reporting specifically on the rocket attacks launched from Gaza to Israel. In this way when Israel retalliates it appears that they are being overly aggressive, when in fact they have been extremely restrained for the most part. It is believed that Hamas is purposefully targetting Israel to draw them into the conflict so as to conceal better their factional war with Fatah, which has claimed many lives despite there being an almost continual 'truce' 
(at least according to the BBC)
(at least according to the BBC)If anyone still doubts the dangers and lethal potential of Qassam missiles, we invite you to view this short video of a missile strike in Sderot that knocked the videographer to the ground as a Qassam hit a neighbor's house, injuring a member of the family.
The upsurge in Palestinian factional violence in the Gaza Strip has made international headlines. In the midst of the battles taking place between Hamas and Fatah terrorists, over 30 Qassam missiles have been fired with intent at the residents of Sderot in a 24 hour period and continue to fall even as we write. This, despite Israel's 2006 withdrawal from Gaza and Palestinian claims to be adhering to a "ceasefire". Residents have been injured and schools and private homes struck, causing panic and fear in the town's streets and the closure of schools. The situation has deteriorated to such an extent that a partial evacuation of the most vulnerable residents has begun.
No country in the world can tolerate this sort of bombardment of its civilian population and Israel has, so far, in the face of intense domestic pressure, acted with great restraint, launching limited retaliatory strikes against the terrorists responsible for the Qassam attacks. A wider military operation may yet materialize. Media outlets have been quick to cover these Israeli measures. Yet, many have simply buried the story of Sderot and the context behind Israel's military response. Far fewer have managed to give this issue the justice that it deserves.
Credit to the Associated Press for running a detailed report from Sderot, which has been picked up by the online versions of the Washington Post, New York Times and Guardian, amongst others, though not necessarily in the print editions - a poor substitute for full coverage. The AP wire service is available to all of the international media. So why haven't they all used it in the absence of their own journalists visiting the scene? With Gaza a no-go area for journalists since the kidnapping of the BBC's Alan Johnston, there is even less excuse for reporters on the ground not to visit Sderot, which, despite the Qassams, is still freely accessible.
We make no apologies for once again raising the issue of the media's scant coverage of Qassam attacks on Sderot. Why is this important? Because, without this proper context and the story of Sderot's suffering, any Israeli reaction that makes front page news, will wrongly imply that Israel is the aggressor despite the obvious need to take self-defensive measures.
Make sure your local media is doing justice to the tragedy that is taking place in Sderot - if you cannot find adequate coverage, send an e-mail asking why this is the case. Details of many media outlets can be found on our website.
The upsurge in Palestinian factional violence in the Gaza Strip has made international headlines. In the midst of the battles taking place between Hamas and Fatah terrorists, over 30 Qassam missiles have been fired with intent at the residents of Sderot in a 24 hour period and continue to fall even as we write. This, despite Israel's 2006 withdrawal from Gaza and Palestinian claims to be adhering to a "ceasefire". Residents have been injured and schools and private homes struck, causing panic and fear in the town's streets and the closure of schools. The situation has deteriorated to such an extent that a partial evacuation of the most vulnerable residents has begun.
No country in the world can tolerate this sort of bombardment of its civilian population and Israel has, so far, in the face of intense domestic pressure, acted with great restraint, launching limited retaliatory strikes against the terrorists responsible for the Qassam attacks. A wider military operation may yet materialize. Media outlets have been quick to cover these Israeli measures. Yet, many have simply buried the story of Sderot and the context behind Israel's military response. Far fewer have managed to give this issue the justice that it deserves.
Credit to the Associated Press for running a detailed report from Sderot, which has been picked up by the online versions of the Washington Post, New York Times and Guardian, amongst others, though not necessarily in the print editions - a poor substitute for full coverage. The AP wire service is available to all of the international media. So why haven't they all used it in the absence of their own journalists visiting the scene? With Gaza a no-go area for journalists since the kidnapping of the BBC's Alan Johnston, there is even less excuse for reporters on the ground not to visit Sderot, which, despite the Qassams, is still freely accessible.
We make no apologies for once again raising the issue of the media's scant coverage of Qassam attacks on Sderot. Why is this important? Because, without this proper context and the story of Sderot's suffering, any Israeli reaction that makes front page news, will wrongly imply that Israel is the aggressor despite the obvious need to take self-defensive measures.
Make sure your local media is doing justice to the tragedy that is taking place in Sderot - if you cannot find adequate coverage, send an e-mail asking why this is the case. Details of many media outlets can be found on our website.