|
Post by Teddy Bear on Jun 29, 2009 19:25:06 GMT
There's the obvious initial thought that Ross is one of those at the BBC who not only epitomizes the lack of talent there, but is vastly overpaid in direct inverse proportion.
The 'insult to injury' is that so many 'license fees' are given to this arrogant and self-aggrandizing shmuck, shouldn't he be more supportive of the hand that feeds him? We can all agree with the lack of quality and talent at the BBC, but is it the one who reaps the most from their lack of vision the one to point that out?
|
|