|
Post by habbiner on Oct 14, 2013 13:17:07 GMT
The sunday morning politics programme on the BBC has answered my ignorance as to how the BBC can display political views overtly, and get away with it.
There was a discussion in regards to newspapers freedoms being reigned in or capped. The point was made against the right wing papers that they functioned under political influence. Noooo, stop, i know. Apparently the royal charter prevents overt political influence being exerted on the media. This is being looked at and possibly changed in regards to the press.
If this bag of worms is opened, then surely the BBC would then be open to change from whatever government is in power. It is not in the BBCS interest to have this changed, i wouldnt have thought. This change cannot be limited to the press alone. Surely.
There are so many paradoxes in life. The freedom enjoyed by the BBC and the Guardian to subvert, lie, manipulate, destroy, be ignorant, childish,perverted, is protected by.....THE ROYAL FAMILY.
The corruption of the left can not be described as left any longer, but dangerous right wing extremists. God help us all.
Andrew Neil, this man needs to be fired. Obnoxious doesnt describe it.
Here we have The Guardian and the BBC undermining decency and fairness, doing its best to detroy democracy, and its right to do that is............PROTECTED BY THE ROYAL FAMILY.
There are so many paradoxes in life, it is more than fair to describe the BBC and the Guardian as right wing.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Sept 29, 2013 17:17:18 GMT
I watched the Sunday Politics programme on the BBC this morning. The two subjects discussed were racism in the boardroom and workplace, and whether discipline in the classroom is, as the presenter stated "old fashioned". My main point is that the BBC sets the agenda on what is fed to millions of people, with a socialism is best bent. The main socialist pannelist was of course gay, wearing a pink jacket. Both subjects got short shrift by the other pannelists, as well as the phone vote. Im tired of the constant struggle to maintain some sense of sanity. We have to fight even to maintain an opinion other than the red dictators. British state education is a disgrace. It is pi peing against the wind. The battle against paranoia and immaturity is all consuming and a full time job. Raging at the criminals at the BBC and the Labour party will only lead to an early grave. When extremism takes hold theres always ways of looking for a short cut. Any punitive action would of course be seen by the useful fools as proof they are right. Nero i think it is who said, "If Rome only had one neck". The tendrils of evil are many and robust, and never ending. The world wasnt built to deliver fairness and justice, and yet i still expect it. In a world like this it is the honest and the fair who suffer, unless we become like it, corrupt ,deceitful, manipulative, aggressive, power mad, self seeking, blind, ugly by expressing wrong beliefs, psychopathic , and ruthless. My best wishes to those on the front line....you will lose by the way. There are few sunny days. Habb.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Sept 17, 2013 12:19:02 GMT
I read the Daily Mail. In todays editorial it stands shoulder to shoulder with the BBC to protect its independance, saving it from politically controlled watchdogs, OFCOM to be exact.
Apparently putting editorial and financial regulation into the hands of politically controlled watchdogs is an assault on freedom of expression, and should horrify all lovers of liberty. OFCOM are lefties apparently.
Do i have to state the obvious? The BBC have no independance, and is controlled by loony lefties, or communists. OFCOM is run by blairites, apparently, which is better than old style commy anarchists, such are entrenched at the BBC.
The Mail has had an IQ shortout. Here we have the Mail defending the status quo at the BBC. As for defending free speech and independance, then i accuse the Mail of PSYCHOSIS.
The BBC is not free or independant. It is run by anarchists with a political agenda hell bent on destroying British society.
Another disturbing fact. According to Mr Hitchens, the conservative pre 1960s society is fast being replaced by the liberal socialist post 1960s generation. This is probably true.
God help us all.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Aug 9, 2013 17:56:07 GMT
I have to admire the political fanatics that have gained overwhelming control of the BBC. Their organised, proactive, motivated and crucially, intelligent. They have an answer for everything.
The latest propaganda on the news features the booming poulation. Its not immigration, but it obviously is. They interviewed new mothers, eastern european, asian, and chinese, then say the factors for the baby boom is not new arrivals.
Confidence in their impregnable position is growing to the point of taking the p, as above.
Today, the BBC drew a parralel with racism in regards to the government encouraging illegal immigrants to go home. I dont understand why the left think flooding the country with immigrants is a good thing. Can anyone tell me why?. The logic will be interesting. Destroying british society is my guess.
The Tories are trying to get ukip voters back with their vans.
Everything is dishonest, manipulative, two faced, bare faced, missing the point, psychotic, superficial, removed from reality, warlike, immoral, psychopathic, conscienceless, murderous but with no body except for Blair and Clinton, facile, expedient, and untrustworty.
And as far as politicians are concerned, they arnt any of those things, and if they had any insight, couldnt care less. Habb.
p.s. whoever runs the BBC, your a genius.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 31, 2013 12:19:00 GMT
Ive just watched the 1-00 news, and the BBC glories in exposing political and business scandals. Especialy Tory ones. The presenter smiled while reporting it.
While doing this, they present themselves as ambassadors of justice and fairness. This obscures the truth.
The BBC are as guilty of corruption of the highest order, yet condemn others. Criminals are tried and punished, or most. The BBC get away with corrupt practices into perpetuity.
IT MAKES ME SICK TO MY STOMACH. Habb.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 25, 2013 11:41:53 GMT
The BBC has been hijacked by The Guardian for its own chaotic political ends. And there is NOTHING anybody can do about it. In such a disturbing situation the only option is to make fun.
The best that could be said of the BBC is that they are doing dodges. Other words used to describe it could be trickiness, hypocrisy, cooking the figures, falsehoods,political skunks, rats with gold teeth, spongers, bunch of robbers, Quislings, objectional louts, freaks, paid hacks, parasites, spivs, racialists, let me get my breath.
Judases, deliberate fabricators,devoid of any truth, phallic lovers, ignorant,odious, lacking conscience, a source of infection,cowards, berks, arrogant b@stards,cretins, slippery theives, creeps,english Herr Himmlers, weak minded, political thugs, witless blind and stupid.
That will do for now. Habb.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 22, 2013 15:15:08 GMT
It has recently come to my notice that the BBC have a royal charter protecting its independance. Has any one read this? I havent, and my take on this is that its independance has been breached.
My interpretation of independance is that it is free from financial abuses, and is POLITICALLY independant.
To state the obvious, the BBC is not politically independant. Any fool can see that. Does this breach its royal charter.? If not, does that mean that the monarchy approves of the BBCS political affiliation.? How BAD is that. And weird.
Another weird aspect is that the Tory government sits back and allows the BBC to spout Labour propaganda. Why? If they wanted to put it right they can.
Can i remind the tory party that allowing the BBC to spread Labour gospel and verse nationally, day in day out, year after year, costs votes. It costs include fairness and objectivity.
Why not act? They are on everything else. Curioser and curioser. Habb.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 15, 2013 22:07:58 GMT
Im sure youve been down the beach and turned over stones that are in or half out of the water. What crawls and swims for cover makes you skin crawl.
Thus it is with the NHS. A programme desiged to kill people to improve figures. Neglect of epic proportions. All covered up by Gordon Brown and his Labour Generals.
The NHS and the BBC are the last two bastions of public ownership, ancient galleons doomed for the scrapyard.
What creepy crawly blood suckers hide in the murky depths of a television corporation run for itself.
Private ownership isnt perfect, but its easier to put right than self serving killers, and political dinosaurs.
As it is with education. I might be naive in this, but the government pay the wages of the BBC, the teachers, and the NHS. Why does the government have to persuade these people to do their jobs properly. Why dont they tell them to, or get out?
Habbiner.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 12, 2013 20:20:43 GMT
It seems odd to me that the BBCS failure to condemn terrorist atrocities, yet take every chance to undermine everything about society that isnt Labour, is a good indicator that they themselves are terrorists of a different ilk.
May i remind them that should Muslims get any form of power in this country, then vast swathes of the BBC will get the chop in a painful place. The BBC positively discriminates towards gay people.
This shows that they will sacrifice anything to impose their form of dictatorship. No more Mr Alexander on that quiz show. Amazing how many presenters are gay. Shocking.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 11, 2013 12:56:26 GMT
I thought you had to be gay to get a job. Or pretend.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 7, 2013 14:11:46 GMT
I didnt mean to come across ungrateful for this site, just frustrated. Im delighted that someone has looked into the legalities of what the BBC are doing, to the vast majority its obvious the BBC are completely biased, except in the eyes of the law.
Nearly everybody i talk to expresses the views that are written on this site, yet the country seems to me to be almost entirely Labour, or communist. There is no distinction.
I dont get this disparity. When i watch programmes like Sunday Politics, and The Big Questions, my blood boils. And yet i see myself as a socialist, but not the regressive, destructive, evil undermining, manipulative, lying rubbish of Labour.
Ive worked in the NHS with social workers, all of which are headbangers of the first order. How do people get to think like this? How can they believe it? The only sense i can make of it is that they are like Mormons or Adventists etc.
As a friend said, there is no correlation between a high iq gullibilty, you can be super bright, but taken in by coviction.
The return to common sense seems to be happening with the daily humiliation of the red bretheren. I feel helpless in the face of it, but someting will crop up, it always does.
Regards, Habbiner.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 4, 2013 11:32:05 GMT
Teddybear, Ive been browsing the site. It seems to me that there are to many sections, it needs condensing. It will take a long time to read it all.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 4, 2013 11:22:27 GMT
p.s. Recently it came by word of mouth that a friend of a friend was in hospital as an inpatient, and threw up. She asked for help from a nurse. The nurse said "I dont do that, ive got a degree".
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 4, 2013 11:19:54 GMT
I cant disagree with any of that. I have a character that when presented by a problem, i have to do something about it. You have by creating this site, but it doesnt change it.
The BBC continues to brain wash the easily led into a political mind set that is harmful to everyone.
Maybe you can help. Maybe you know people in the legal profession who think like us that can investigate the legalities, or illegalities of their shocking practices. Isnt that a bigger stick than a moaning site?
I have worked most of my working life in the NHS. It is a public service like the BBC. It serves its own purposes like the BBC, and service to the "customer ", is secondary to its own needs.
Patient care is secondary to management.
The BBC is the same. It serves its own purpose and needs to be SWEPT AWAY. Im looking for a workable way to do it. It sounds grand but so what. I watch the BBC news just to marvel at its screwed up mentality, and its lies. No one blows the whistle because people want to continue to work.
What gets my goat is that i help pay for it. That REALLY makes me angry. Regards, Habbiner.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 3, 2013 13:25:18 GMT
The government announced plans to capitalise on Fracking which will provide this country with 140 years of cheap gas. The Labour benches booed everything.
Sometimes i wonder if the Labour party has an innate desire to destroy Britain. It opposes everything but which is good for itself.
Cromwell dissolved parliament until all the members acted in the best interests of Britain, not its regions.
Labour are old style soviets, blind to everything but its own diseased beliefs.
|
|
|
Post by habbiner on Jul 3, 2013 13:09:01 GMT
I cant see the point of detailing the BBCs political bias. Its across all the channels in a co-ordinated way. I would be here all day if we could.
There must be an office that co-ordinates its political output that equates to social engineering.
My central point is this. I havent read the constitution of the BBC, neither am i a lawyer. What i am asking is that someone somewhere must investigate whether the BCC are BREAKING THE LAW.
Surely they have no right to express a political opinion funded by the tax payer.
Changes at the top are useless, they appoint ex BBC employees. Patten is part of the problem. Political extremists now control the BBC and it must stop.
If it was possible to bring a court case i would certainly help fund it.
Regards, Habbiner.
|
|