Post by cherenkov on Nov 20, 2011 13:05:19 GMT
I'm a scientist by trade though I won't say what branch of science I ply my trade in, just that my screen name is NOT a hint. I've lived in England most of my life, and love the country and the people in the main, but I was born in Scotland. I am married and a step-father of one young man who has left home now and doing well for himself.
I was born just under a decade after World War Two and have seen a lot of changes, and the emergence of of the UK's self-destructive political cycle, i.e. Lab > Con > Lab > Con.... For me, the advent of coalition government in this country is possibly the only way we can put an end to a political oscillation that has so damaged our country over the decades since the war.
Also, as an Anglophilic Scot (yes we do exist, and in larger numbers than some might care to think) I have no liking for the SNP, and believe that the breaking up of the UK is not necessary to address any credible grievances the SNP claim against the union.
Perhaps because I'm a scientist, I am a realist politically, I deeply distrust and dislike the blinkered thinking of any kind of idealist, and look for rationality, objectivity and above all impartiality from the news service providers of this country.
After due consideration I am now of a view that the three main parties, in England, and those parties seriously in contention in the other UK countries should be government funded, with unions and other vested interest groups like banks and corporations banned from seeking influence through huge donations. That this is not the case, as in what follows, is why I'm joining this forum, having felt the BBC News is failing to be impartial, and I think I can see why.
National Union of Journalists supports ATL, NUT, PCS and UCU strike
There are over 4000 members of this union (The National Union of Journalists) paying their union dues to this biased, anti-government union, including some 200 members in Scotland. When you consider that over 90% of the funding for the Labour party comes from the unions, including the NUJ members, at the BBC and elsewhere, how can you expect anything other than a continuing anti-coalition bias to emerge, which I and many others, as confirmed by the BBC itself on it's own feedback programme, believe we are witness to day after day.
The BBC's response is that such allegations are an insult to the professionalism and integrity of it's staff, and it is actually us that are perceiving a bias because we are are ourselves biased in favour of the present government!
All I would say is that that rather insulting speculation would be easier to stomach were the NUJ and other unions not so well embedded in the BBC News, clearly militant, and clearly deeply idealogically opposed to anything to do with the coalition....
Strictly Come Dancing final could be hit by BBC strikes
I was born just under a decade after World War Two and have seen a lot of changes, and the emergence of of the UK's self-destructive political cycle, i.e. Lab > Con > Lab > Con.... For me, the advent of coalition government in this country is possibly the only way we can put an end to a political oscillation that has so damaged our country over the decades since the war.
Also, as an Anglophilic Scot (yes we do exist, and in larger numbers than some might care to think) I have no liking for the SNP, and believe that the breaking up of the UK is not necessary to address any credible grievances the SNP claim against the union.
Perhaps because I'm a scientist, I am a realist politically, I deeply distrust and dislike the blinkered thinking of any kind of idealist, and look for rationality, objectivity and above all impartiality from the news service providers of this country.
After due consideration I am now of a view that the three main parties, in England, and those parties seriously in contention in the other UK countries should be government funded, with unions and other vested interest groups like banks and corporations banned from seeking influence through huge donations. That this is not the case, as in what follows, is why I'm joining this forum, having felt the BBC News is failing to be impartial, and I think I can see why.
National Union of Journalists supports ATL, NUT, PCS and UCU strike
There are over 4000 members of this union (The National Union of Journalists) paying their union dues to this biased, anti-government union, including some 200 members in Scotland. When you consider that over 90% of the funding for the Labour party comes from the unions, including the NUJ members, at the BBC and elsewhere, how can you expect anything other than a continuing anti-coalition bias to emerge, which I and many others, as confirmed by the BBC itself on it's own feedback programme, believe we are witness to day after day.
The BBC's response is that such allegations are an insult to the professionalism and integrity of it's staff, and it is actually us that are perceiving a bias because we are are ourselves biased in favour of the present government!
All I would say is that that rather insulting speculation would be easier to stomach were the NUJ and other unions not so well embedded in the BBC News, clearly militant, and clearly deeply idealogically opposed to anything to do with the coalition....
Strictly Come Dancing final could be hit by BBC strikes