Yesterday again, for the third time,
an arsenal of rockets were found on an UNRWA school premises. No doubt these too will be handed over to Hamas, making the UN complicit in war crimes.
Still no article by the BBC that highlights the import of this news.
Their biggest news however, both on their Middle East page as well as their Home page, is this article:
Gaza conflict: UN accuses Israel over Jabaliya attackIsrael attacked a UN-run school housing refugees in Gaza despite warnings that civilians were there, the UN has said.
UN spokesman Chris Gunness said "the world stands disgraced" by the attack, in which 15 died and dozens were hurt.
The Israeli military said an initial inquiry suggested soldiers responded to mortar fire. It says it is now holding a partial, four-hour humanitarian ceasefire.
Some 1,200 Palestinians and 55 Israelis have been killed in the conflict.
Most of the Palestinian deaths have been civilians.Now I have no idea of the real circumstances of these deaths but a certain logic makes these claims suspicious, besides various omissions show a clear bias.
Israel is well aware that it is getting demonized by much of the world media for being responsible for civilian deaths in Gaza. It is clear that there is little or no blame for Hamas for using civilian areas to launch attacks against Israel, knowing full well civilians will be in the firing line.
Israel does it's best to warn civilians to flee areas that will be targeted by a variety of means. In fact the BBC does show one picture to this effect, but no explanation of the import in relation to this, or any other of their articles.
So it's clear that Israel has to respond to attack, but is doing all it can to avoid innocents suffering. The very fact that they put troops on the ground, which creates a higher death toll to their own soldiers, rather than fire missiles from planes, is all part of this effort.
So it's unlikely that knowing civilians, particularly children, are sheltering in a school, Israel would fire on them.
So how does the UN 'know' that it was the result of Israeli fire that killed these civilians?
They 'know' that 3 times now they have already found Hamas rockets on the premises.
They know that Hamas fired first at Israeli troops from the area.
Anybody with a modicum of intelligence would also know that the only kind of 'success' that Hamas can hope to reach with their aggression is to demonize Israel in the eyes of the world. They certainly have nowhere near the weaponry they would need to seriously threaten Israel in a war.
Therefore Hamas needs these civilian deaths, and besides stopping civilians from fleeing areas that Israel has warned will be hit, making sure there will be casualties, it wouldn't surprise me at all, given their mindset, that they will purposefully kill their own people to make sure that children will be hit.
Plain common sense!
Given that the UNRWA are very aware that Hamas have used their schools to conceal rockets, shows they're well aware of the disregard Hamas has for it's own people.
The BBC also seems to have no problem stating 'most of the Palestinian deaths have been civilians'.
But no mention of any figure that might indicate just how many were terrorists, or 'militants' as the BBC refers to them.
As I've already noted, if Israel was so disregarding of human life in Gaza, NONE of the BBC journalists would have enough guts to remain there. They do so because they know that short of some unexpected accident, like a Hamas rocket landing short, as a lot of them do, they will be safe and secure.
Near the end of the article the BBC reports
So there's no question they too are well aware of this flagrant disregard for civilian life by Hamas, but prefer not to show it in any meaningful way.
One can read nearly every line in their article, as well as news reports, that it is pure spin that is being spread, will little or no logic or common sense.