|
Post by Teddy Bear on Dec 6, 2014 20:00:13 GMT
No doubt the BBC will excuse this ridiculous pairing as 'entertainment' and giving the audience what they want. In actual fact since they don't have anybody to seriously counter the common sense views that Farage will express, and the support that he has gained, they just picked the moron Brand to shout him down.
|
|
|
Post by dance2drop on Dec 12, 2014 19:18:21 GMT
I think I may have posted this before (can't remember senior moment).
I watched last night's fiasco from Canterbury and was incensed. I knew it would be very heated with RB and NF on the programme. Why give any air time to that obnoxious Brand beggars belief. As for that chav with the blue hair ranting and raving and threatening Nigel, she should have been immediately removed from the building. Wasn't she on TV with RB the other night when he was having a go about Landlords etc ? There was a lady with him then with blue hair. Obviously a plant by the Beeb with rent a gob Brand fans and lefties by the score.
I was delighted when a senior citizen man in the audience had a real go at Brand. The only saving grace was the columnist from one of the tabloids. She spoke a lot of sense.
Well, that's me until next year and my blood pressure given a rest.
I complained to BBC about this programme. Not that it will do any good.
Wishing all of you on here a Happy and Peaceful Christmas.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Dec 12, 2014 22:13:23 GMT
And the same to you Dance I think what I will be posting now will explain a few things about this programme. Let's see first how the BBC reviewed it. Let's clear up first just who the 'woman in the audience who gave Nigel such a hostile response' is. Her name is Bunny la Roche and back in 2004 she was a candidate for the European elections with George Galloway's Respect party. She shows the type of 'respect' that the BBC show in being fair, impartial, and balanced. Later she went to the Socialist Workers Party where she resigned from last year, and was apparently 'thoroughly disliked', and is now of the Thanet Stand Up To UKIP campaign. She seems quite proud of an event she organised in January where Nigel was hit by a 'Nasty Little Nigel' placard that was the theme of the protest. Later in May the same group were responsible for pelting him with eggs. Here's a clip of her manner during Question Time What the BBC doesn't tell you here is that she was also shouted done by another woman in the audience who really put her in her place. The BBC also makes it appear that 'the call from 'the audience' for Brand to stand for election' was genuine support, when in fact it was more 'put up or shut up', to which a lot of the audience, sick of his moronic outbursts, were behind. For the next year the whole programme is available to watch here.Even the Independent managed to give a far more honest report of what happened in the show, but I'll let the 2 articles from the Mail explain it more thoroughly.
|
|
|
Post by charmbrights on Dec 13, 2014 9:13:11 GMT
I stand by my advance decision not to watch this programme rubbish. At my age I have to watch my blood pressure, but at least I don't have to pay for my TV licence any more.It sounds more Channel 5 to me.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Dec 13, 2014 17:35:50 GMT
Any intelligent person who sees Russell Brand is soon turned off from wanting to endure any more than they need to, unless they are also masochists. Most won't spend time analysing his particular personality or mindset, as life is too short, and will simply describe him as YUCCCHH.
But Robin Mitchinson at the Commentator has taken the time to spell it out. It's worth noting that the BBC continue to use him on various programmes, so clearly they think his mindset is valuable to them, which says a lot about the BBC.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Dec 13, 2014 18:58:20 GMT
I see the man in the audience who was able to humiliate Brand is the brother of a UKIP MEP. The BBC have jumped on this fact and run a full page article about it.Does the fat that he's a brother of a UKIP MEP make him a 'plant' as the BBC want to have you believe? If a 'plant' is important to them, then they would be well aware of the ex SWP member Bunny La Roche who's allegiance has been circulating throughout the media, yet they don't feel it important to mention this, much less run an article about it themselves. Which pretty much becomes one more example that shows the mindset of the BBC. In their article the BBC also doesn't mention the fact that he 'was once reportedly asked to stand as a Ukip candidate', which we glean from a Telegraph article on the subject. Since he obviously declined this invitation suggests he doesn't have political ambitions in this department, and is therefore not a plant. The BBC also claim in their article: We're well aware of the BBC interpretation of fairness and impartiality, as well as the 'broad political balance' they want to present as actual. I've also twice been in the QT audience and was never 'personally questioned to ensure I held the views I stated in the application'.
|
|
|
Post by steevo on Dec 14, 2014 5:57:41 GMT
Well done like in your original post, they're playing the same ole and it seems like decades of consistent left-wing MO I'm used to. Pit a clown/radical in the eyes of the common voter with a legitimate politician and you diminish the latter's stature. Then plant some hand-picked 'audience'. It's so obvious or should be it really struck me. Very good research on your behalf... and good for the one man in the audience - did the Beeb goof?
|
|
|
Post by charmbrights on Dec 14, 2014 10:52:49 GMT
Now the truth appears. If you consider the number of "programmes" which are basically just advertisements for the contributors' new books it is quite apparent that the BBC regards the fact of publishing a book as a major contribution to the information that the public needs. How often on such programmes such as Radio 4 's Broadcasting House, pm, even Inside Science, etc. are there guests who have just had, or ar about to have a book published. That is ignoring the blatantly advertising magazine programmes like Bookclub, A Good Read, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Dec 14, 2014 16:33:35 GMT
and good for the one man in the audience - did the Beeb goof? Cheers Steevo As to whether they goofed, I doubt they research the history of every applicant for the audience, but go more on whatever is put as their political leanings. I've no doubt they would want to limit UKIP supporters as much as they could, especially when Farage is appearing. Charm, no doubt the BBC would claim that are just putting out information in the public interest and are not strictly advertising. No doubt if we researched the type of books that get a mention this way they will ALL coincide with the BBC propaganda.
|
|
|
Post by charmbrights on Dec 16, 2014 11:43:13 GMT
... Charm, no doubt the BBC would claim that are just putting out information in the public interest and are not strictly advertising. No doubt if we researched the type of books that get a mention this way they will ALL coincide with the BBC propaganda. See the current row about the "Book at Bedtime" serialisation of the Mantell short story on the murder of Margaret Thatcher at biasedbbc.proboards.com/thread/2008/public-anger-bias-thatchers-death.
|
|
|
Post by dance2drop on Dec 17, 2014 16:30:09 GMT
I didn't intend to post any more on this subject. However as I have just received this from the Beeb, to whom I complained bitterly about QT with Brand and Nigel, I thought you might like to see their reply. Speaks volumes ! Dear Mrs Maskell Thanks for contacting us regarding ‘Question Time’ broadcast on the 11 December. We understand you felt Russell Brand was an inappropriate choice of panellist. We are always looking to broaden the range of panellists on ‘Question Time’. We seldom have people on simply because of their prominence as an entertainer - invariably there will be a strong political or other dimension to them. Russell Brand, although known to many as a comedian, has been vocal on a number of political and social issues as of late. With that in mind, the programme felt that he might contribute positively to the discussion, bringing a fresh eye to the issues being raised. We are always mindful of the need to introduce a broad range of views on matters being discussed. This was a lively edition of 'Question Time' and strong views were expressed by panellists and audience members alike. Russell Brand’s comments and views were directly challenged by members of the audience in Canterbury, by other panellists, and by chair David Dimbleby. We believe the programme was carried out in a fair and impartial manner. Thanks again for contacting us. -------- I didn't say to them Brand was an inappropriate choice of panellist, I told them he was a rude ignorant pig, or something like that ! ------------- What do they mean - I thought Russell was an inappropriate panellist. I told them he was a rude ignorant pig, or something of that ilk.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Dec 17, 2014 17:25:57 GMT
Dance, you didn't really think they were going to admit that he was chosen because he's a crass, loud, arrogant, ignorant moron that they knew would shout down Farage, now did you? But for the audience member who put him in his place he would have fulfilled the BBC's expectations. Russell Brand, although known to many as a comedian The only funny thing I find about him is calling him a comedian.
|
|