Post by Teddy Bear on Mar 23, 2015 18:24:40 GMT
Following the descent by liberal activists on a pub where Nigel Farage and his family were eating, James Delingpole writes of the left wing mindset that really doesn't see just how hypocritical they are. While most of his article focusses on the Guardian support for this group, as can be seen from the most liked comment following the article, and a few of the replies it received, which I'll include, the BBC is no different.
(Multiple links available on article itself)
Another article on a similar group highlights the same kind of mindset: CELEBRITY-BACKED ANTI-FRACKING GROUP CONDONING VIOLENCE AGAINST OPPONENTS
(Multiple links available on article itself)
Another article on a similar group highlights the same kind of mindset: CELEBRITY-BACKED ANTI-FRACKING GROUP CONDONING VIOLENCE AGAINST OPPONENTS
AS FARAGE HAS JUST BEEN REMINDED, THERE’S NO FASCIST LIKE A LIBERAL FASCIST
by JAMES DELINGPOLE
Suppose Labour leader Ed Miliband had been out yesterday for a quiet bacon sandwich with his wife and kids only to be harassed and terrorised by a bunch of protestors from the Daily Mail. Can you imagine the coverage it would get on the BBC and in the Guardian?
And what about if Green party leader Natalie Bennett had a few friends round for a vegan barbecue, only to be driven from their supplies of tofu and mung beans and cucumber dip by a crowd of Spectator journalists dressed in pin stripe suits and bowler hats?
There’s a reason you can’t imagine these scenarios, except in jest. It’s because the right-leaning media just doesn’t promote or engage in political activism in the way that the left-leaning media does, especially not the kind of direct action stunt we saw yesterday being carried out against Nigel Farage by a mob led by an activist (and occasional Guardian columnist) called Dan Glass. (h/t Bishop Hill)
The Guardian clearly loves Dan Glass. Here’s what it had to say a few years back about his work “fighting to stop the injustice of climate change.”
Besides having run three columns by Glass, the Guardian has also given space to the Trotskyite burblings of perma-revolutionary Eva Jasiewicz – another member of the fancy dress mob who harrassed the Farages at the weekend. And also to this woman, Pennie Quinton who was also boasting on Twitter about her involvement in the anti-UKIP renta-mob. See also Guardian contributor Emily Churchill (no relation, one imagines), who crowed about having helped ruin the Farage family lunch with the phrase “We are family!”
Now you could argue that the Guardian can’t be held responsible for the actions of a few idiots who have written for it in the past. Maybe not. But what you can most definitely blame it for, I think, is the uncritical coverage it gives both to them individually (see flattering profile of Glass above) and collectively at protests everywhere from Kingsnorth to Balcombe.
Whether these protests are about breast-feeding or coal-fired power or fracking or neonicotinoids or bankers or air travel, what you find time and again is the same hardcore of activists at the heart of each protest. The cause seems to be almost an irrelevance. What counts far more is the intensity of their shrill self-righteousness and the corresponding passion of their hatred for whichever particular target they happen to be protesting against on that particular day.
You can see that self-righteousness in some of the comments below the Guardian’s report on the Farage affair. Here’s one from a charmer calling himself “Postcolonial”.
And here is the Guardian’s columnist Suzanne Moore telling us that the protestors who had Farage’s children fleeing in fear were just a lovely, harmless, playful bunch really and that the Farages over-reacted…
The worst thing that Moore can find to say about the incident is that it may play to Farage’s advantage.
(If Moore had wanted to make the point with the charm and wit of which unfortunately she is incapable, she might have nicked this, much funnier analysis from a Guardian commentator called Boynamedstu: “Because nothing will make people considering voting for UKIP change their mind than a coachload of inner city dwelling, unemployed drama graduates and soap dodgers intimidating him and scaring his kids while he is out for a Sunday lunch. These arsehats have probably done more to increase the UKIP vote than a front page picture of a Romanian eating a swan while shitting on a Princess Di commemorative tea towel.”)
One of the fondest delusions of the left – heavily promoted by the Guardian and the BBC, among others – is that civilisation is continually on the brink of being destroyed by a handful of “far-right” groups, be they the EDL, the BNP, Combat 18 or whichever initialled one-man-and-a-dog outfit happens to be the current left-wing bete noir of the month.
But this threat from the “far-right” is a liberal fantasy. Not just a fantasy, but also a monstrous, deliberate and cynical distraction from the truth, which is that almost all the non-Islamist ugliness, malevolence and political aggression of our time emanates from the fascistic left rather than from any organisation that seriously deserves the title “right-wing”. We saw this during the Scottish elections in the bully-boy tactics of the SNP. We saw it at the various Occupy demos. And we see it time and again in the antics of the “watermelons” (green on the outside, red on the inside) of the green movement (several of whose members, see above, were involved in the mobbing of the Farages).
Along with Islamism, liberal fascism represents probably the biggest threat to freedom, civilisation and decency of our era. And you know what’s the most depressing thing about it? These scum – as Farage so rightly called them – not only think they have right and justice on their side. They also genuinely, sincerely believe that they are nice.
It’s a sick, weird world we live in, is it not?
by JAMES DELINGPOLE
Suppose Labour leader Ed Miliband had been out yesterday for a quiet bacon sandwich with his wife and kids only to be harassed and terrorised by a bunch of protestors from the Daily Mail. Can you imagine the coverage it would get on the BBC and in the Guardian?
And what about if Green party leader Natalie Bennett had a few friends round for a vegan barbecue, only to be driven from their supplies of tofu and mung beans and cucumber dip by a crowd of Spectator journalists dressed in pin stripe suits and bowler hats?
There’s a reason you can’t imagine these scenarios, except in jest. It’s because the right-leaning media just doesn’t promote or engage in political activism in the way that the left-leaning media does, especially not the kind of direct action stunt we saw yesterday being carried out against Nigel Farage by a mob led by an activist (and occasional Guardian columnist) called Dan Glass. (h/t Bishop Hill)
The Guardian clearly loves Dan Glass. Here’s what it had to say a few years back about his work “fighting to stop the injustice of climate change.”
Dan Glass, 27, activist
“Whenever anybody sticks their head above the parapet they’re seen as a lunatic, but we need to show the inadequacies of the legal system for protecting the earth.”
Youth climate activists blog : Dan Glass
Dan was recently named one of Attitude Magazine’s 66 new role models for his work on bridging the gay rights and environmental justice movements. He revels in creating militant but cheeky ways to be a “thorn in the side of those destroying the planet”; he has stuck himself to a former prime minister, occupied Aberdeen airport, danced with old ladies blighted by flightpaths, and worked in deprived inner-city communities with So We Stand. Dan has spent much of 2010 in court, over action he took with protest group Plane Stupid at Aberdeen airport, and is now on trial for allegedly conspiring to shut down Ratcliffe-on-Soar coal-fired power station (the verdict is expected today). You can read his article on the disproportionate effects of climate change on marginalised communities in December’s Attitude magazine – it’s the one with lots of naked men on the cover.
“Whenever anybody sticks their head above the parapet they’re seen as a lunatic, but we need to show the inadequacies of the legal system for protecting the earth.”
Youth climate activists blog : Dan Glass
Dan was recently named one of Attitude Magazine’s 66 new role models for his work on bridging the gay rights and environmental justice movements. He revels in creating militant but cheeky ways to be a “thorn in the side of those destroying the planet”; he has stuck himself to a former prime minister, occupied Aberdeen airport, danced with old ladies blighted by flightpaths, and worked in deprived inner-city communities with So We Stand. Dan has spent much of 2010 in court, over action he took with protest group Plane Stupid at Aberdeen airport, and is now on trial for allegedly conspiring to shut down Ratcliffe-on-Soar coal-fired power station (the verdict is expected today). You can read his article on the disproportionate effects of climate change on marginalised communities in December’s Attitude magazine – it’s the one with lots of naked men on the cover.
Besides having run three columns by Glass, the Guardian has also given space to the Trotskyite burblings of perma-revolutionary Eva Jasiewicz – another member of the fancy dress mob who harrassed the Farages at the weekend. And also to this woman, Pennie Quinton who was also boasting on Twitter about her involvement in the anti-UKIP renta-mob. See also Guardian contributor Emily Churchill (no relation, one imagines), who crowed about having helped ruin the Farage family lunch with the phrase “We are family!”
Now you could argue that the Guardian can’t be held responsible for the actions of a few idiots who have written for it in the past. Maybe not. But what you can most definitely blame it for, I think, is the uncritical coverage it gives both to them individually (see flattering profile of Glass above) and collectively at protests everywhere from Kingsnorth to Balcombe.
Whether these protests are about breast-feeding or coal-fired power or fracking or neonicotinoids or bankers or air travel, what you find time and again is the same hardcore of activists at the heart of each protest. The cause seems to be almost an irrelevance. What counts far more is the intensity of their shrill self-righteousness and the corresponding passion of their hatred for whichever particular target they happen to be protesting against on that particular day.
You can see that self-righteousness in some of the comments below the Guardian’s report on the Farage affair. Here’s one from a charmer calling himself “Postcolonial”.
Well I suppose they could have tarred and feathered him. But we can still dream.
And here is the Guardian’s columnist Suzanne Moore telling us that the protestors who had Farage’s children fleeing in fear were just a lovely, harmless, playful bunch really and that the Farages over-reacted…
Those protesting against Farage were in fancy dress, which is why the pub owners thought it was some kind of birthday party. They called themselves “a cabaret of diversity” and were seeking to represent some of the groups Farage has offended: “Migrants, HIV activists, gay people, disabled people and breast-feeding mothers.” No doubt this boisterous group may have seemed a bit scary although, to be honest, it all looked harmlessly theatrical in the pictures.
The worst thing that Moore can find to say about the incident is that it may play to Farage’s advantage.
And actually, it may backfire for other reasons too, because increasingly Farage plays the victim. And this allows him to. He can present himself as the innocent victim of attacks by fruitcakes, when, in fact, he spends most of his time attacking the vulnerable.
(If Moore had wanted to make the point with the charm and wit of which unfortunately she is incapable, she might have nicked this, much funnier analysis from a Guardian commentator called Boynamedstu: “Because nothing will make people considering voting for UKIP change their mind than a coachload of inner city dwelling, unemployed drama graduates and soap dodgers intimidating him and scaring his kids while he is out for a Sunday lunch. These arsehats have probably done more to increase the UKIP vote than a front page picture of a Romanian eating a swan while shitting on a Princess Di commemorative tea towel.”)
One of the fondest delusions of the left – heavily promoted by the Guardian and the BBC, among others – is that civilisation is continually on the brink of being destroyed by a handful of “far-right” groups, be they the EDL, the BNP, Combat 18 or whichever initialled one-man-and-a-dog outfit happens to be the current left-wing bete noir of the month.
But this threat from the “far-right” is a liberal fantasy. Not just a fantasy, but also a monstrous, deliberate and cynical distraction from the truth, which is that almost all the non-Islamist ugliness, malevolence and political aggression of our time emanates from the fascistic left rather than from any organisation that seriously deserves the title “right-wing”. We saw this during the Scottish elections in the bully-boy tactics of the SNP. We saw it at the various Occupy demos. And we see it time and again in the antics of the “watermelons” (green on the outside, red on the inside) of the green movement (several of whose members, see above, were involved in the mobbing of the Farages).
Along with Islamism, liberal fascism represents probably the biggest threat to freedom, civilisation and decency of our era. And you know what’s the most depressing thing about it? These scum – as Farage so rightly called them – not only think they have right and justice on their side. They also genuinely, sincerely believe that they are nice.
It’s a sick, weird world we live in, is it not?
Derek Phibes • 3 hours ago
There were plenty of places to 'protest' directly in front of Farage, but this group selected a time and place when he was with his children:
seems remarkably like stalking, harassment and intimidation to me.
Jo Coburn - Daily Politics - gave Glass a platform today, and she had her venom ready for UKIP; typical Beeb = attack the victim, support the attacker.
63 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
damage124 Derek Phibes • 2 hours ago
I watched her sneering as usual and looking like she had a very unpleasant smell up her nose when talking to the Ukip man while treating the halfwit Glass like some hero.
I shouldn't have been surprised, they had convicted fraudster and Rotherham Asian abuse denier Denis McShane on last week.
36 • Reply•Share › Show 1 new reply
Avatar
44th "Fighting Fours" damage124 • an hour ago
And she wouldn't let Patrick O'Flynn (UKIP MEP) finish, and kept saying that he hadn't answered the question. I think she went on Have I Got News For You a few years back and spouted even more hatred against UKIP. The whole BBC does.
There were plenty of places to 'protest' directly in front of Farage, but this group selected a time and place when he was with his children:
seems remarkably like stalking, harassment and intimidation to me.
Jo Coburn - Daily Politics - gave Glass a platform today, and she had her venom ready for UKIP; typical Beeb = attack the victim, support the attacker.
63 • Reply•Share ›
Avatar
damage124 Derek Phibes • 2 hours ago
I watched her sneering as usual and looking like she had a very unpleasant smell up her nose when talking to the Ukip man while treating the halfwit Glass like some hero.
I shouldn't have been surprised, they had convicted fraudster and Rotherham Asian abuse denier Denis McShane on last week.
36 • Reply•Share › Show 1 new reply
Avatar
44th "Fighting Fours" damage124 • an hour ago
And she wouldn't let Patrick O'Flynn (UKIP MEP) finish, and kept saying that he hadn't answered the question. I think she went on Have I Got News For You a few years back and spouted even more hatred against UKIP. The whole BBC does.