Post by Teddy Bear on Dec 26, 2007 18:30:39 GMT
Honest Reporting has picked up on a Palestinian version of 'A Christmas Story'
Pallywood's producers are constantly creating stories for the foreign media as part of Palestinian efforts to blacken Israel's image. As Rod Liddle has observed, writing for the UK's Spectator magazine:
A good example of how the news can be distorted by photographers comes from a demonstration staged by Palestinians near Bethlehem on 21 December 2007. Pallywood has signed up one of the most visible and loved symbols of the holidays - Santa Claus. Wait until the cameras are in position and then confront Israeli soldiers. If the wire service happens to be using a Palestinian photographer you even get the bonus of a caption depicting an unsubstantiated incident based solely upon Palestinian "eyewitnesses" as in the AFP photo below:
Let's take a look at a similar photo and caption from the same incident, this time taken by Kevin Frayer (presumably not a Palestinian) for the Associated Press:
So it seems that the soldier has not, as the AFP would have you believe, "tackled" Santa. The soldier is clearly holding on to the clothing of another demonstrator while Santa has jumped into the fray creating a timely scene for Xmas.
Nowhere are you able to get an accurate picture of the size of the demonstration or otherwise. Photos of the event, such as the one below from Reuters are framed as close-ups giving the impression of a large turnout even when closer examination, such as the previous photos, may suggest the opposite:
Reuters' own video of this event certainly seems to suggest a small number of people attending this demonstration Also notice how the Palestinian Santa appears to be well trained and media savvy - while managing to instigate dramatic photos of being "tackled" by Israeli soldiers, Santa suddenly becomes an advocate of peace and hope when interviewed by a Reuters cameraman. Such is the sophistication of the Palestinian propaganda machine that Santa is able to provoke violent confrontation while, at the same time, talking about peace. With the aid of a compliant media, Israel is still painted as the bad guy.
The images taken by AFP, AP and Reuters are used by media outlets around the world who do not have the resources to check the validity of a caption or even the story covered by the photographers. In the final analysis, it is the power of the image that is important - and it nearly always appears negative for Israel irrespective of the facts or the context.
So keep an eye out for these types of image - after all, as we have seen in the Lebanon Fauxtography and al-Dura cases to name but two - the camera doesn't always tell the whole story.
If we - or some other TV monkeys - had not been there, it would not have happened. (Emphasis added) We were there to witness injustice; and also, if possible, exacerbate it for the benefit of the viewing public.... And when the TV crews, or the international observers are around, the Palestinians play it up for all it is worth; they know how it will go down with an international audience.
A good example of how the news can be distorted by photographers comes from a demonstration staged by Palestinians near Bethlehem on 21 December 2007. Pallywood has signed up one of the most visible and loved symbols of the holidays - Santa Claus. Wait until the cameras are in position and then confront Israeli soldiers. If the wire service happens to be using a Palestinian photographer you even get the bonus of a caption depicting an unsubstantiated incident based solely upon Palestinian "eyewitnesses" as in the AFP photo below:
Caption: An Israeli soldier tackles a Palestinian protester dressed as Santa Claus or Father Christmas during at a protest against Israel's separation barrier in the village of Umm Salamunah near the biblical West Bank town of Bethlehem. Israeli guards beat five demonstrators during the protest on Friday, organisers said. (AFP/Musa al-Shaer)
Let's take a look at a similar photo and caption from the same incident, this time taken by Kevin Frayer (presumably not a Palestinian) for the Associated Press:
Caption: A Palestinian protester dressed as Santa Claus, or Father Christmas, tries to block an Israeli soldier from arresting another demonstrator at a protest against Israel's separation barrier in the village of Umm Salamona, near the biblical West Bank town of Bethlehem, Friday, Dec. 21, 2007. Israel says the barrier is necessary for security, while Palestinians call it a land grab. The man was not injured in the incident. (AP Photo/Kevin Frayer)
So it seems that the soldier has not, as the AFP would have you believe, "tackled" Santa. The soldier is clearly holding on to the clothing of another demonstrator while Santa has jumped into the fray creating a timely scene for Xmas.
Nowhere are you able to get an accurate picture of the size of the demonstration or otherwise. Photos of the event, such as the one below from Reuters are framed as close-ups giving the impression of a large turnout even when closer examination, such as the previous photos, may suggest the opposite:
Caption: A Palestinian protester dressed as Santa Claus scuffles with Israeli border police officers during a demonstration against the construction of the controversial Israeli barrier in the West Bank village of Umm Salamouna, south of Bethlehem, December 21, 2007. (REUTERS/Nayef Hashlamoun)
Reuters' own video of this event certainly seems to suggest a small number of people attending this demonstration Also notice how the Palestinian Santa appears to be well trained and media savvy - while managing to instigate dramatic photos of being "tackled" by Israeli soldiers, Santa suddenly becomes an advocate of peace and hope when interviewed by a Reuters cameraman. Such is the sophistication of the Palestinian propaganda machine that Santa is able to provoke violent confrontation while, at the same time, talking about peace. With the aid of a compliant media, Israel is still painted as the bad guy.
The images taken by AFP, AP and Reuters are used by media outlets around the world who do not have the resources to check the validity of a caption or even the story covered by the photographers. In the final analysis, it is the power of the image that is important - and it nearly always appears negative for Israel irrespective of the facts or the context.
So keep an eye out for these types of image - after all, as we have seen in the Lebanon Fauxtography and al-Dura cases to name but two - the camera doesn't always tell the whole story.