Post by Teddy Bear on Feb 16, 2011 16:52:23 GMT
Following Israel easing the blockade of Gaza to allow a wider variety of products to be imported there, it appears that Hamas has been feeling the pinch. Before they were able to profit by smuggling goods through tunnels from Egypt, with the blockade eased, people in Gaza can now obtain these goods far cheaper. So is Hamas happy that the 'humanitarian crisis', that the BBC loved to report about - always quoting the wringing hand sources within the UN and sundry 'human rights organisations, besides the 'poor Palestinians themselves, now it has been eased? E
Apparently not, Hamas is more concerned about it's lost revenues from smuggling these items. So they have imposed their own blockade of Israeli goods that can be imported into Gaza. Bear in mind that even after Israel had eased this blockade the BBC were still running articles that it didn't go far enough to ease 'crippled Gaza'. Naturally Hamas used the opportunity to further the negativity that Israel should be seen in, and the BBC were happy to quote their views, without the logical inference that perhaps if they stopped firing rockets at Israel there would be more harmony.
It would appear that whoever controls which stories should be aired from the region decided that it wouldn't be in their interest to report on these latest decisions by Hamas. After all how can they show Israel causing a humanitarian crisis on the one hand by a 'crippling blockade' even after it's eased, when Hamas then comes along and imposes their own?
For the BBC, better people don't know about it.
The eminent Robin Shepherd writes about it here:
Hamas imposes blockade of Israeli goods to Gaza, global outcry at “humanitarian crisis” fails to materialise
I’m all eyes and ears. Surely it’s going to come from every direction imaginable: saturation coverage on the BBC, leader columns in the Financial Times, op-eds by the dozen in the Guardian, resolutions galore in the European Parliament and the UN, a UK Foreign Office enraged by the cruelty of it all. What on earth have the Israelis done now? Well hold on to your braces, because the blockade of Gaza is back, and, wait for it, it’s now been imposed by Hamas.
Yes, you read that right. Nine months after Israel began relaxing restrictions on exports to the Gaza strip Hamas has re-imposed them. The blockade will apply to all goods that can’t be produced locally or obtained from elsewhere. The reason for the move is partly that like all Islamo-fascist outfits Hamas does not look kindly on things that bear the fingerprint of the dreaded Jew — or as the Jerusalem Post reported it, they’d rather do business with the Arabs — but also it’s because, now that imports are flowing in from Israel, the terror group’s extortion rackets from the tunnels between Gaza and Egypt are yielding a good deal less in revenue than they used to.
Surely there’s going to be an outcry! The Gaza “blockade”, let’s not forget, was one of the great humanitarian causes of our time: malnourished children roaming the streets in search of food; babies with jaundice; old women huddled around camp fires because the evil Israelis had cut off the fuel supplies. Believe it or not, a ban on Israeli fuel is part of the new blockade: “Hamas has also stopped the daily fuel supplies it used to receive from Israeli energy company Dor Alon,” the Jerusalem Post reported today. “In the past, Dor Alon used to transfer about 1,000 liters a day to the Gaza Strip for the power station, but now Hamas prefers to receive its fuel from a contraband pipeline it has set up through a tunnel under the Egyptian-Gazan border”.
In all seriousness, the way that this story is handled in Western political and media circles is going to tell us something very significant indeed. Because if, as I strongly suspect, the story is largely (or wholly) ignored the charge of bigotry against the massed ranks of Israel’s critics over Gaza will have been proved beyond the slightest shred of reasonable doubt.
It’s a slam dunk argument: concern for the welfare of the people of Gaza either was the reason for the outrage at the restrictions, or it wasn’t. If it wasn’t, then it was bigotry. And we will know whether it was or it wasn’t very soon.
NB: So far, the only word about Gaza on the MidEast section of the BBC website is on something I wrote about in the last posting but one — the BBC’s celebration of a Gaza “war crimes” photo exhibition by a photographer whose work has compared Israel to Nazi Germany. But let’s just see what happens….
Apparently not, Hamas is more concerned about it's lost revenues from smuggling these items. So they have imposed their own blockade of Israeli goods that can be imported into Gaza. Bear in mind that even after Israel had eased this blockade the BBC were still running articles that it didn't go far enough to ease 'crippled Gaza'. Naturally Hamas used the opportunity to further the negativity that Israel should be seen in, and the BBC were happy to quote their views, without the logical inference that perhaps if they stopped firing rockets at Israel there would be more harmony.
It would appear that whoever controls which stories should be aired from the region decided that it wouldn't be in their interest to report on these latest decisions by Hamas. After all how can they show Israel causing a humanitarian crisis on the one hand by a 'crippling blockade' even after it's eased, when Hamas then comes along and imposes their own?
For the BBC, better people don't know about it.
The eminent Robin Shepherd writes about it here:
Hamas imposes blockade of Israeli goods to Gaza, global outcry at “humanitarian crisis” fails to materialise
I’m all eyes and ears. Surely it’s going to come from every direction imaginable: saturation coverage on the BBC, leader columns in the Financial Times, op-eds by the dozen in the Guardian, resolutions galore in the European Parliament and the UN, a UK Foreign Office enraged by the cruelty of it all. What on earth have the Israelis done now? Well hold on to your braces, because the blockade of Gaza is back, and, wait for it, it’s now been imposed by Hamas.
Yes, you read that right. Nine months after Israel began relaxing restrictions on exports to the Gaza strip Hamas has re-imposed them. The blockade will apply to all goods that can’t be produced locally or obtained from elsewhere. The reason for the move is partly that like all Islamo-fascist outfits Hamas does not look kindly on things that bear the fingerprint of the dreaded Jew — or as the Jerusalem Post reported it, they’d rather do business with the Arabs — but also it’s because, now that imports are flowing in from Israel, the terror group’s extortion rackets from the tunnels between Gaza and Egypt are yielding a good deal less in revenue than they used to.
Surely there’s going to be an outcry! The Gaza “blockade”, let’s not forget, was one of the great humanitarian causes of our time: malnourished children roaming the streets in search of food; babies with jaundice; old women huddled around camp fires because the evil Israelis had cut off the fuel supplies. Believe it or not, a ban on Israeli fuel is part of the new blockade: “Hamas has also stopped the daily fuel supplies it used to receive from Israeli energy company Dor Alon,” the Jerusalem Post reported today. “In the past, Dor Alon used to transfer about 1,000 liters a day to the Gaza Strip for the power station, but now Hamas prefers to receive its fuel from a contraband pipeline it has set up through a tunnel under the Egyptian-Gazan border”.
In all seriousness, the way that this story is handled in Western political and media circles is going to tell us something very significant indeed. Because if, as I strongly suspect, the story is largely (or wholly) ignored the charge of bigotry against the massed ranks of Israel’s critics over Gaza will have been proved beyond the slightest shred of reasonable doubt.
It’s a slam dunk argument: concern for the welfare of the people of Gaza either was the reason for the outrage at the restrictions, or it wasn’t. If it wasn’t, then it was bigotry. And we will know whether it was or it wasn’t very soon.
NB: So far, the only word about Gaza on the MidEast section of the BBC website is on something I wrote about in the last posting but one — the BBC’s celebration of a Gaza “war crimes” photo exhibition by a photographer whose work has compared Israel to Nazi Germany. But let’s just see what happens….