Post by djfearross on Jul 6, 2011 9:38:10 GMT
As we all know the BBC is always available to report any negative story going about Christianity, but pan over the hard work Christians charities do around the world, helping the poorest of the poor, regardless of race or religion.
However, when i saw this article about a Christian Charity I wondered how the BBC would wiggle its way out of a positive report for the charity.
What's it like to be a sponsored child?
Sponsoring a child in the developing world is a popular form of charitable giving. But what do the children themselves make of the system?
Priscilla
When Priscilla was a child, a donor many thousands of miles from her Ghanaian village helped pay for her schooling.
For years she exchanged letters with her British benefactor. Now she is 20, the charity has stopped the sponsorship and the relationship.
"Last year I wrote to them saying goodbye and thanked them for taking care of me up to this day," says Priscilla, an accountancy student. "When I was writing, I was full of tears. Tears were coming from my eyes."
Sponsor-a-child arrangements throw up emotional highs and lows for the children, something many donors are unaware of.
Priscilla's sponsorship was arranged through World Vision. The charity has boosted the fortunes of Dangme West, which used to be one of the most deprived areas in greater Accra, the capital of Ghana.
Youngsters such as Priscilla are sponsored for up to 15 years. They often receive letters and gifts, so many feel a close bond with their sponsor.
Augustina, 14, who hopes to become a doctor, says her sponsor has sent her many things - shoes, bags, crayons, books. She hopes her sponsor loves her, and wants to visit her in England.
Some even want their sponsors' e-mail addresses, so they can carry on their correspondence into adulthood. But charities do not encourage this, for fear of dependency.
It's an arrangement that can bring disappointment, as well as money. Abraham tells me he hasn't heard from his sponsor for eight years, and he doesn't know why.
More than eight million children around the world are sponsored by Western benefactors. This takes the form of regular donations to a charity, which links the sponsor with a deprived child. The charity also oversees the exchange of letters, and also provides updates on the child's progress.
It is a form of aid that's popular with donors, being high on the feel-good factor, and lucrative for charities as a source of long-term funding. About $3bn (£1.8bn) is channelled towards the poorest children in this way every year.
Sussex University report on some sponsor-a-child schemes
There are two approaches to child sponsorship. The oldest is still used by the evangelical Christian organisation, Compassion.
In the run-down industrial area of Kpone-on-Sea near Accra, sponsors' regular donations help more than 200 children with free schooling, healthcare and extra Saturday classes in life skills such as basic sanitation and computers.
Sponsors are encouraged to write, and often have a very personal link with their child, even to the degree of being their spiritual mentor.
"I think of them as close relatives," says Mary, 12. She thinks it's great that someone in another country has seen her picture and chosen to be her friend.
When she feels lonely, she looks through the letters and pictures from the family that sponsors her.
Compassion is proud of its Christian ethos. The sponsored children are chosen by local churches, but the charity says families of any faith can benefit.
We visit a Muslim family living in a dark, cramped, one-room house. They hope sponsorship will help their 11-year old son eventually get a good job so they can escape poverty.
Does he mind that this means he is getting a Christian education?
"I feel that Allah and God are the same, and the Bible and the Koran, too, are the same," he says. His mother agrees.
But is it fair?
Some donors make financial gifts in addition to their sponsorship payments.
Jennifer, in pink, and family outside their new home
Another family we visit has recently moved to a new settlement thanks to generous extra cheques from a donor in the US.
Twelve-year-old Jennifer shows off her new concrete house. "I am surprised that somebody so far away that I don't even know loves me this way," she says.
While Compassion's sponsored children have effectively won the lottery, some aid experts argue that this approach is unfair and divisive.
So many big charities now allocate sponsors' money to community development projects instead of focusing it on individual children.
This is the kind of scheme World Vision operates for Priscilla and others in Dangme West.
Plan International also uses the community development approach. A few years ago they commissioned a study from Sussex University into the impact of their operations.
Its 2008 report found there was "anxiety, jealousy and disappointment among those children and families who receive no letters or gifts".
And, notwithstanding the success stories, "the much larger scale of unmet expectations and emotional disappointment for children poses a serious ethical concern and challenge".
A classroom in Odumase
Plan has since tried to manage children's expectations. It is abolishing gifts, and no longer requires children to write unless the sponsor writes to them.
When Plan arrived in the village of Odumase, west of Accra, 17 years ago, there was no school building, no clean drinking water nor sanitation. The village has benefited hugely from sponsorship funds. And aside from letters, there is no difference between what sponsored and unsponsored children receive.
We watch as a big brown envelope is delivered to one of the sponsored children, 13-year-old Ebenezer. It is the third piece of correspondence he has received in seven years, and contains a postcard and a few words of greeting.
Ebenezer appears crestfallen. Although happy to get the postcard, Ebenezer feels the lack of gifts means his sponsor doesn't care about him, and that makes him sad.
But Eric and Naomi, the teenage helpers, enthusiastically begin to help him draft a reply. He wants to ask for a football and a skipping rope, but that, he is told, is not allowed.
This raises the question - without the direct financial link and the gifts, and if donors aren't frequent writers, what is left of the sponsorship relationship? And should it be abandoned altogether?
Naomi and Eric help Ebenezer write to his sponsor
Plan UK's chief executive, Marie Staunton, argues that sponsorship is still an intrinsic part of the development process, helping with education and the necessary reporting back to head office on how children are faring. It also gives leadership experience to the teenagers who help with the process.
"I don't think the sponsorship we do is diluted at all. What sponsors want is long-term changes in children's lives. Because of sponsorship, we are focused on children, children have a say. People like Eric and Naomi have had years of communicating to people outside their village."
The charities argue it's a way to raise money that would not otherwise be there for development. Ultimately, though, it will be for donors to decide the future of child sponsorship.
Rather than portray the Christian charity in a positive light and high lighting the work they do, they say a few words and then go straight to reporting on the Muslim that attends it.
They even praise the Muslim for receiving a Christian education, rather than praising the Christian charity for taking in Muslims. The BBC used this as an opportunity to show what they believe is 'Muslim Tolerance'.
However, when i saw this article about a Christian Charity I wondered how the BBC would wiggle its way out of a positive report for the charity.
What's it like to be a sponsored child?
Sponsoring a child in the developing world is a popular form of charitable giving. But what do the children themselves make of the system?
Priscilla
When Priscilla was a child, a donor many thousands of miles from her Ghanaian village helped pay for her schooling.
For years she exchanged letters with her British benefactor. Now she is 20, the charity has stopped the sponsorship and the relationship.
"Last year I wrote to them saying goodbye and thanked them for taking care of me up to this day," says Priscilla, an accountancy student. "When I was writing, I was full of tears. Tears were coming from my eyes."
Sponsor-a-child arrangements throw up emotional highs and lows for the children, something many donors are unaware of.
Priscilla's sponsorship was arranged through World Vision. The charity has boosted the fortunes of Dangme West, which used to be one of the most deprived areas in greater Accra, the capital of Ghana.
Youngsters such as Priscilla are sponsored for up to 15 years. They often receive letters and gifts, so many feel a close bond with their sponsor.
Augustina, 14, who hopes to become a doctor, says her sponsor has sent her many things - shoes, bags, crayons, books. She hopes her sponsor loves her, and wants to visit her in England.
Some even want their sponsors' e-mail addresses, so they can carry on their correspondence into adulthood. But charities do not encourage this, for fear of dependency.
It's an arrangement that can bring disappointment, as well as money. Abraham tells me he hasn't heard from his sponsor for eight years, and he doesn't know why.
More than eight million children around the world are sponsored by Western benefactors. This takes the form of regular donations to a charity, which links the sponsor with a deprived child. The charity also oversees the exchange of letters, and also provides updates on the child's progress.
It is a form of aid that's popular with donors, being high on the feel-good factor, and lucrative for charities as a source of long-term funding. About $3bn (£1.8bn) is channelled towards the poorest children in this way every year.
Sussex University report on some sponsor-a-child schemes
There are two approaches to child sponsorship. The oldest is still used by the evangelical Christian organisation, Compassion.
In the run-down industrial area of Kpone-on-Sea near Accra, sponsors' regular donations help more than 200 children with free schooling, healthcare and extra Saturday classes in life skills such as basic sanitation and computers.
Sponsors are encouraged to write, and often have a very personal link with their child, even to the degree of being their spiritual mentor.
"I think of them as close relatives," says Mary, 12. She thinks it's great that someone in another country has seen her picture and chosen to be her friend.
When she feels lonely, she looks through the letters and pictures from the family that sponsors her.
Compassion is proud of its Christian ethos. The sponsored children are chosen by local churches, but the charity says families of any faith can benefit.
We visit a Muslim family living in a dark, cramped, one-room house. They hope sponsorship will help their 11-year old son eventually get a good job so they can escape poverty.
Does he mind that this means he is getting a Christian education?
"I feel that Allah and God are the same, and the Bible and the Koran, too, are the same," he says. His mother agrees.
But is it fair?
Some donors make financial gifts in addition to their sponsorship payments.
Jennifer, in pink, and family outside their new home
Another family we visit has recently moved to a new settlement thanks to generous extra cheques from a donor in the US.
Twelve-year-old Jennifer shows off her new concrete house. "I am surprised that somebody so far away that I don't even know loves me this way," she says.
While Compassion's sponsored children have effectively won the lottery, some aid experts argue that this approach is unfair and divisive.
So many big charities now allocate sponsors' money to community development projects instead of focusing it on individual children.
This is the kind of scheme World Vision operates for Priscilla and others in Dangme West.
Plan International also uses the community development approach. A few years ago they commissioned a study from Sussex University into the impact of their operations.
Its 2008 report found there was "anxiety, jealousy and disappointment among those children and families who receive no letters or gifts".
And, notwithstanding the success stories, "the much larger scale of unmet expectations and emotional disappointment for children poses a serious ethical concern and challenge".
A classroom in Odumase
Plan has since tried to manage children's expectations. It is abolishing gifts, and no longer requires children to write unless the sponsor writes to them.
When Plan arrived in the village of Odumase, west of Accra, 17 years ago, there was no school building, no clean drinking water nor sanitation. The village has benefited hugely from sponsorship funds. And aside from letters, there is no difference between what sponsored and unsponsored children receive.
We watch as a big brown envelope is delivered to one of the sponsored children, 13-year-old Ebenezer. It is the third piece of correspondence he has received in seven years, and contains a postcard and a few words of greeting.
Ebenezer appears crestfallen. Although happy to get the postcard, Ebenezer feels the lack of gifts means his sponsor doesn't care about him, and that makes him sad.
But Eric and Naomi, the teenage helpers, enthusiastically begin to help him draft a reply. He wants to ask for a football and a skipping rope, but that, he is told, is not allowed.
This raises the question - without the direct financial link and the gifts, and if donors aren't frequent writers, what is left of the sponsorship relationship? And should it be abandoned altogether?
Naomi and Eric help Ebenezer write to his sponsor
Plan UK's chief executive, Marie Staunton, argues that sponsorship is still an intrinsic part of the development process, helping with education and the necessary reporting back to head office on how children are faring. It also gives leadership experience to the teenagers who help with the process.
"I don't think the sponsorship we do is diluted at all. What sponsors want is long-term changes in children's lives. Because of sponsorship, we are focused on children, children have a say. People like Eric and Naomi have had years of communicating to people outside their village."
The charities argue it's a way to raise money that would not otherwise be there for development. Ultimately, though, it will be for donors to decide the future of child sponsorship.
Rather than portray the Christian charity in a positive light and high lighting the work they do, they say a few words and then go straight to reporting on the Muslim that attends it.
They even praise the Muslim for receiving a Christian education, rather than praising the Christian charity for taking in Muslims. The BBC used this as an opportunity to show what they believe is 'Muslim Tolerance'.
