The BBC's Charter and its Producers Guidelines state:
...'Due impartiality lies at the heart of the BBC. All programs and services should be open minded, fair and show a respect for truth? [BBC reports should] contain comprehensive, authoritative and impartial coverage of news and current affairs in the United Kingdom and throughout the world??
The BBC was accused of focusing on Poles in its coverage of immigration issues because it is afraid to look at non-white groups from around the world.
Conservative MP Danny Kawczynski - himself of Polish descent - said it was more palatable for the corporation's 'liberal elite' to highlight white Christians arriving than far larger numbers from Africa, India and elsewhere.
Mr Kawczynski told the Commons the 'distorted' coverage was fuelling hate crimes against Poles and said he was appalled by the failure of the Equality and Human Rights Commission to take action.
He added: 'If this was being done to a black or other ethnic minority group, it would simply not be tolerated.'
Mr Kawczynski's criticism came as he introduced a Bill calling for a bank holiday to mark the contribution Poles have made to the UK since 1940, when Polish pilots shot down more than 600 enemy aircraft during the Battle of Britain.
The BBC rejected the criticism and accused the MP of failing to back up his 'serious allegations' with evidence.
At present, the BBC is only answerable to itself in deciding its standards and coverage. How does it measure up to what you consider good quality, and impartial and unbiased reporting as required by its charter? All TV viewers in the UK are forced by law to pay for this 'service'. Do you believe that what is received truly 'serves' the society, - or merely increases the problems within it?
Your perceptions of BBC output are important and welcome. Register and activate your account to be able to post