BBC on Theresa May and the 'Human Rights' Cat

[Teddy Bear]

Seeing this headline in the Telegraph,

Terror relocation rules: what they say about the Human Rights Act ...
October 4 2011 | News
Deportation rules will be rewritten to stop foreign criminals and terrorists using the Human Rights Act to remain in Britain, Theresa May will promise today. Here is what British politicians and experts say about the Act.

and knowing the BBC stance on advocating all Human Rights acts, particularly the EU ones, regardless of merit, I wondered how they would try to 'protect' it.

It appears in her statement denouncing the human rights act at the Conservative conference, Theresa May had used one example of an illegal immigrant who could not be deported because he had a cat.
So, along with all the left wing rags, the BBC were all over her to ridicule her statement, apparently proving that no such case existed.

In just the same way they ignore those stories that bely their agenda, when they think it serves them they go overboard to make news of it. A search of the BBC website showed at least 13 articles, some with video, have been run, that in effect ridicule her attempt.

THIRTEEN!

Fact is, the essence of what she claimed is true, but you won't read that on the BBC articles on the subject, although surprisingly the Guardian did run it. The case she is referring to is where the imbecile of a judge using the human rights law said this before deciding to allow an illegal immigrant to stay: The immigration judge said: "The evidence concerning the joint acquisition of Maya (the cat) by the appellant and his partner reinforces my conclusion on the strength and quality of the family life that appellant and his partner enjoy."

The judge added: "Canadian courts have moved away from the legal view that animals are merely chattels, to a recognition that they play an important role in the lives of their owners and that the loss of a pet has a significant emotional impact on its owner."

Here's what you'll see the 'balanced' BBC has on it:

[thehighlandrebel]

I'm noticing this as well, Teddy.
There seems to be an inordinate amount of air space given to this cat but still nothing on the Iranian pastor sentenced to death for his faith.

Surely our politicians and the decent people of this country must now realise that b-bbc has now turned into a farce and making people have to pay for it by 'law' should be looked at urgently.

Let the b-bbc ask for funding from it's core influence, Al Qaeda, the Taleban and the PLO and rid decent law abiding citizens of the shame of having to prop it up.

[Teddy Bear]

Oct 5, 2011 0:44:55 GMT thehighlandrebel said:

Surely our politicians and the decent people of this country must now realise that b-bbc has now turned into a farce and making people have to pay for it by 'law' should be looked at urgently.

To many it's been obvious for years, and it gets worse daily. Yet the 'establishment' does nothing, perhaps out of fear, and the public continues to suck it up.

We can only hope and try to make it as clear as possible about how harmful their agenda truly is to our society, in the hope that 'the decent people' will wake up and do something.

As I put on our main page "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

[carl1960]

An issue close to my heart (The human rights act) after the last election and the Labour MP was ousted, we had a Tory MP to replace him one of the first letters I sent to him was concerning the non action over the replacment of the human rights act. The reply I got back was basically they had more important things to deal with the economy. So yet another broken promise along with the non opportunity for the Nation to vote on Europe.

[Teddy Bear]

Oct 6, 2011 15:21:55 GMT carl1960 said:

...another broken promise along with the non opportunity for the Nation to vote on Europe.

And doesn't look like one will come any-time soon

[carl1960]

I had the mis- fortune to watch Question Time last night, the Question I assume is why it was on. The catflap gate issue came up with calls May was being childish. However the issue is this does refer to an illegal immigrant (the key word here being illegal) and as far as I can tell which is difficult with the smokescreen being put up the point of owning a cat was used towards the evidence of a stable family life. Therefore in material fact although not totally the fulcrum of the case it was inclusive. Given the stupidity of other judgments made it would of been no suprise to me if the cat ownership had been the major point of evidence.
As Iron Maiden would say "Can I play with Madness"

[Teddy Bear]

That's the difference between thinking for oneself through any issue of the day, and allowing the BBC or any media to think for one. So long as people are content to allow left wing liberal media students to think for them, which will be until the shit that has been hitting the fan for so long has built up under their chin, this is what we're stuck with.