|
Post by Teddy Bear on Mar 11, 2012 21:46:43 GMT
Last November when I read this article Tom Watson attacks BBC's Nick Robinson over phone hacking I smelled a rat. Since anybody accusing the BBC of not doing enough in their coverage of the phone hacking scandal had either just been released from a mental institution, or was trying to convince the public that the BBC was unbiased. I commented on it here. A few weeks ago I read this article BBC accused of peddling "propaganda" for the monarchy The BBC has been accused of peddling "propaganda" for the monarchy after the leak of emails from a documentary-maker which said no-one with a "bad word" to say about the Queen would be interviewed, and I had the same feeling. It's becoming a more regular ploy for the BBC to try and make it appear that they are something which they are not. I commented at the time here to the effect that it stank, aware full well of the BBC's socialist agenda and a flagrant anti-Royal mentality. It was especially fishy when it emerges that The exchanges were contained in two emails leaked to the anti-monarchy group Republic, which accused the BBC of “censorship”. So it's no surprise reading this article today BBC gives anti-monarchy group Republic free rein on Radio 4’s TodayThe BBC allowed the anti-monarchy group Republic an unopposed platform to criticise the Queen on its flagship radio programme, fuelling a growing row over the corporation’s coverage of the Diamond Jubilee.If it looks like shit, and smells like shit..... Expect many more of these types of deception from the BBC to come.
|
|