Post by Teddy Bear on Jan 14, 2014 20:52:44 GMT
David Elstein, former head of Channel 5, says the BBC has a "vested interest" in mass immigration because it means there will be more licence fee payers
BBC Trust accused of failing to control big pay-offs
This certainly is an additional factor that makes the BBC promote immigration as they do.
There's also the dynamic that they increase their power having more people beholden to them, and the increased number that will fall for their brainwashing.
In addition there is still the matter of the loans they receive from the EU
We can say it's how the BBC interpret the part of their charter that goes:
bringing the UK to the world and the world to the UK;
In a similar way they interpret independent as being like the newspaper of that name.
It should be privatised, it would be best for the whole country, and ultimately for those working within that insidious organisation as it exists at the moment.
BBC Trust accused of failing to control big pay-offs
This certainly is an additional factor that makes the BBC promote immigration as they do.
There's also the dynamic that they increase their power having more people beholden to them, and the increased number that will fall for their brainwashing.
In addition there is still the matter of the loans they receive from the EU
We can say it's how the BBC interpret the part of their charter that goes:
bringing the UK to the world and the world to the UK;
In a similar way they interpret independent as being like the newspaper of that name.
It should be privatised, it would be best for the whole country, and ultimately for those working within that insidious organisation as it exists at the moment.
BBC has 'vested interest' in mass immigration
David Elstein, former head of Channel 5, says the BBC has a "vested interest" in mass immigration because it means there will be more licence fee payers
BBC Trust accused of failing to control big pay-offs
The BBC has a "vested interest" in mass immigration because it means there will be more people paying the licence fee, the former head of Channel 5 has said.
The corporation has been accused by its own political editor of making a "terrible mistake" over its coverage of immigration, admitting it censored concerns amid fear they could trigger racism.
David Elstein, a former chief executive of Channel 5, told MPs that the BBC's "fortunes" are linked to more people living in Britain. He is calling for the licence fee to be replaced with a subscription-based model.
During an appearance between the Culture, Media and Sport select committee he said: "The BBC might feel nervous about being one of the few bodies with a vested interest in mass immigration.
"It is not a happy place to be when you are one of the few public bodies that directly benefits from the unlimited expansion of the population."
He said that "puerile" game shows such as the Weakest Link risk undermining the BBC's "educate, inform and entertain" public service remit.
"These [values] are defined so broadly even the most puerile quiz at some points will have some information in it.
"What puzzles me about the BBC and its funding is this. The last time we had a committee inquiry into the funding of the BBC was 28 years ago.
"The BBC's evidence to that inquiry says we recognise the rough justice of the licence fee, we're really attracted by the notion of subscription. Since then we haven't had a single word from the BBC about anything it has done.
"The BBC is still where it always was - keep hold of nurse for fear of something worse. It's not even just the BBC that is hanging onto the licence fee, it's ministers. Ministers now have a vested interest in keeping the licence fee going."
David Elstein, former head of Channel 5, says the BBC has a "vested interest" in mass immigration because it means there will be more licence fee payers
BBC Trust accused of failing to control big pay-offs
The BBC has a "vested interest" in mass immigration because it means there will be more people paying the licence fee, the former head of Channel 5 has said.
The corporation has been accused by its own political editor of making a "terrible mistake" over its coverage of immigration, admitting it censored concerns amid fear they could trigger racism.
David Elstein, a former chief executive of Channel 5, told MPs that the BBC's "fortunes" are linked to more people living in Britain. He is calling for the licence fee to be replaced with a subscription-based model.
During an appearance between the Culture, Media and Sport select committee he said: "The BBC might feel nervous about being one of the few bodies with a vested interest in mass immigration.
"It is not a happy place to be when you are one of the few public bodies that directly benefits from the unlimited expansion of the population."
He said that "puerile" game shows such as the Weakest Link risk undermining the BBC's "educate, inform and entertain" public service remit.
"These [values] are defined so broadly even the most puerile quiz at some points will have some information in it.
"What puzzles me about the BBC and its funding is this. The last time we had a committee inquiry into the funding of the BBC was 28 years ago.
"The BBC's evidence to that inquiry says we recognise the rough justice of the licence fee, we're really attracted by the notion of subscription. Since then we haven't had a single word from the BBC about anything it has done.
"The BBC is still where it always was - keep hold of nurse for fear of something worse. It's not even just the BBC that is hanging onto the licence fee, it's ministers. Ministers now have a vested interest in keeping the licence fee going."
