|
Post by indikit on Aug 5, 2007 23:01:27 GMT
Old news maybe and I don't know where YouGov get these drooling articles from BBC grandad and terrorist sicophant John Humphreys, but just listen to him drone on in what is a transparent attempt to repay Hamas for their alleged involvement in securing the release of Alan Nazi Johnston. www.yougov.com/interactive/humphrysMain.asp?aId=5268&jID=3&sID=5&pID=&wId=0&UID=But just read the loaded questions Humphrey's 'asks' of us, like some ancient english schoolteacher in front of a class full of 6 year olds. "What is your view? Do you think that Hamas should be recognised as a legitimate force in Palestinian politics or not? Has its behaviour over the release of Alan Johnston affected your view on this question, or not? Do you think it is hypocritical of the West to preach democracy and then refuse to accept the result of an election or do you think it legitimate for the West to refuse to deal with a group that does not accept that Israel should exist? Do you think Tony Blair can do nay good in his new job, or not? And how do you think Gordon Brown should deal with these issues?" By the way, members of this forum could do some good by joining YouGov and taking part in their lefty infested opinion polls. The more anti-left that infiltrate this site, the less you should see skewed opinion results in various newspapers. www.yougov.com/interactive/humphrysMain.asp?aId=5268&jID=3&sID=5&pID=&wId=0&UID=
|
|
|
Post by brianboru on Aug 6, 2007 9:28:56 GMT
In its praise for Hamas's '[democratic' election the BBC failed to mention that Hamas spent a great deal of money on 'welfare' before the election, with practices that wouldn't stand for a minute under most western democracies. This was bribery on a vast scale with money supplied by Iran or Syria or both and other Arab countries. They are also supplied with weapons and ammunition by these countries. Yes I know that Israel is supported by the US, but as a sovereign country, not as a party,and who would doubt that Israel is a democratci state, considering the political shifts that have occured there. Does anyone believe that in a future election in Gaza any other party would be allowed to win?
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 6, 2007 22:01:02 GMT
One would think that after the kidnapping of the British troops in Iran earlier this year, and their subsequent release by the 'benevolent' Ahmadinajad, any intelligent human beings would suspect a similar ploy played out here by the 'benevolent' Hamas. Even when there is clear evidence showing collusion between Hamas and the Dogmash clan, the BBC prefer to ignore it. After all, they're only journalists and can hardly be expected to research the subjects they cover, unless they feel it is in their own best interests. It's hard to know who the lowest form of life is here. Whether it's the murdering, lying, oppressive, scum devoid of any higher qualities we want to consider human that is Hamas and their kind; or the BBC, hiding behind the values of a democracy which first established them, and without shame or conscience corruptly twist and writhe in the slime they create, as evidenced here by supporting such a group. What goes around - comes around.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 11, 2007 19:50:58 GMT
Two articles about the same incident; The first is the BBC's, and the second from AP. Here's a clear example of how the BBC is misreresenting the scum Hamas and failing to report properly what really happened. This article is 8 hours old and they've had sufficient time to update it, as if that was ever their intention. Anybody wishing to convince any of their friends or family of the reality of BBC bias, here's a current example. The BBC report:Note the headline: Hamas DETAINS Fatah men in GazaAnd this sentence: Television footage showed Hamas militiamen raiding a wedding party. So you'd think that it was a justified raid, like our police would do at a party where drugs were being used and detaining the culprits afterwards. To understand what is really happening, read this article from AP, then ask yourself, if the above is really the way to describe what happened here:
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 13, 2007 20:39:54 GMT
A British parliamentary committee is recommending that the international community should engage with Hamas, as an excerpt from the following article outlines. Well certainly the BBC has been giving Hamas a glowing reference of late, and doing their best to avoid any reports that might malign their 'friends'. Like this one from Jeremy Bowen: Hamas hopeful after Alan's release and this one MPs urging engagement with HamasThey avoided going into the thuglike behaviour Hamas inflicted on guests at a wedding party as I reported in a previous post, but today the 'friends' of the BBC went a little far so the BBC had to report it, in an albeit diluted version. Here's the AP version first so you get an idea of the subhuman mentality and actions of these twisted human beings that some of our MP's and the BBC think we should be engaging with. Now the BBC's version, notice no mention of coercion of the press.
|
|
|
Post by steevo on Aug 14, 2007 5:18:17 GMT
Here's more to speak of the inevitable as the Beeb willingly turns its blind eye propping up the heart of evil. Just a few paragraphs of a more lengthy article with revealing detail:
|
|
|
Post by johnbull on Aug 14, 2007 18:20:37 GMT
For anyone interested in the links between the BBC/ EU and militant Islam, in Palestine and elsewhere, I would highly recomend they read the book "Eurabia- The Euro-Arab Axis" written by Bat Ye'or. Its a real eye opener.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 14, 2007 19:04:30 GMT
John I took the liberty of adding a link to a review of the book you recommend, I hope you don't mind.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 14, 2007 20:01:12 GMT
In the continuing saga of how the BBC is distorting and misrepresenting the intent of Hamas, while doing their upmost to further aims of this insidious and evil organisation, consider the latest incidents.
Hamas has forbidden any kind of civil rally or demonstration for any group other than their own, except as they claim, where previous permission is applied for and granted because of 'security concerns'.
Since the only 'security' issue is Hamas itself, this is quite humourous. Naturally they don't give permission to any other group, and have been violently breaking up any demonstrations, even a wedding attended by members of other factions.
They have confiscated cameras, pictures, and tapes belonging to journalists, in effect, issuing a news blackout on their deeds. A civilized society would find these events rather disturbing, and at best would describe this organisation as despotic and totalitarian. The BBC promotes them however, which shows either they don't represent a civilized society, or don't belong reporting for one.
The choice is yours!
From Reuters:
No mention of confiscation of journalist film and tapes by the BBC on any of their articles. Considering the solidarity shown by journalists for Alan Johnston, hopefully the BBC's 'see no evil, hear no evil' response will disgust them.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 25, 2007 19:17:37 GMT
Bearing in mind that for the BBC to continue their recidivism and play the 'pity' card for the Palestinians whilst vilifying Israel as the scapegoat for their plight, the Pal's have to give some kind of decorum in their actions, even if we all know it's absolute bullshit.
However. Hamas is making it very difficult for the BBC to maintain this angle with too many of their escapades. So what do the BBC do? Simply avoid telling the news that would put Hamas into their true light.
Compare these two articles about the goings on in Gaza today. What do you see the BBC are leaving out?
First the BBC:
Yup that's it! Now the same story from AP:
And the BBC went into competition with Al Jazeera ;D
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 26, 2007 23:05:30 GMT
In its continuing policy of 'see no evil; hear no evil; speak no evil' as far as Hamas is concerned, there is no mention on the BBC website of this story, covered today by the Telegraph.
If Israel was perpetrating the same kind of behaviour towards the Palestinians, as is Hamas, described below, can you imagine the outcry, with the BBC the first to bring the story.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 31, 2007 19:00:22 GMT
Let's have a look at how today the BBC covers a demonstration in Gaza by Fatah supporters against the Hamas regime.
Up to this point one might think it was fairly tolerant of Hamas to allow this (as the BBC like to imply) 'illegal' demonstration. It's only the next line that gives some indication of what happened
If you really believe that this is just another way to cover this story, and that it puts things into perspective from the viewpoint of our society, you must be a Hamas supporter.
Notice the 'empathy' given in the final line about the French journalists injured in a "similar incident", as though they were taking part in the demonstration. I wonder how much solidarity the BBC will get from the media world next time one of their journalists get into trouble.
Here's how the same story was presented by AP, this time more in line with our perspective:
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Sept 7, 2007 23:55:04 GMT
I'm amazed the general media hasn't picked up on and reported the continuing bias by the BBC concerning Hamas. Every time I see a story about fresh violence in Gaza, I know I'm assured of a post here about the way the BBC will 'cover' it (cover perhaps being an operative word for 'covering up', which would be more apt).
Today's example is so blatant it beggars belief.
First here's the story from AP
Now see if you can relate the following story by the BBC to what you read above
Taken to hospital for treatment? They could have been suffering from heatstroke or a stomach ache for all that tells you about the real reasons for their 'malaise'. Bear in mind this report comes from a news organisation that likes to pride itself on its quality and need to exist.
If you wouldn't have read the AP story, would you have quite a different take on what went on in Gaza?
That's the way the BBC wants it.
|
|