|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Oct 12, 2007 21:18:53 GMT
Yesterday a UK High Court judge found 9 'inconvenient untruths' in Al Gore's 'shockumentary' 'An Inconvenient Truth'. Today, along with a UN Intergovernmental panel on climate change he's been granted a Nobel Prize. (Don't forget Arafat also got one for 'peace'  ) So if you had the remit to be impartial and unbiased, and were writing an article about this award, where would you put this judge's findings - at the beginning, in the middle, or the end? I'm sure you know what's coming - yes that's right, you just know where the BBC put it. |
|
|
|
Post by steevo on Oct 12, 2007 21:50:53 GMT
Another inconvenient fact contrary to his truths just came out. It looks like the antarctic icecap is growing and from observable data has surpassed the previous recorded largest volume of mass. "The Southern Hemisphere sea ice area narrowly surpassed the previous historic maximum of 16.03 million sq. km to 16.17 million sq. km. The observed sea ice record in the Southern Hemisphere (1979-present) is not as long as the Northern Hemisphere. (meaning it has not been tracked as long as the North Pole) Prior to the satellite era, direct observations of the Southern Hemisphere sea ice edge were sporadic." arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/ |
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Oct 12, 2007 22:57:03 GMT
(had to edit the link Steevo as it wasn't working for me as it was)
No doubt the greenies will blame increased ice in the south as a result of global warming. you can't win, "There are none so blind as those who will not see".
Do you think the judge's findings altered the views of any at the BBC? They probably think he's been payed off, as well as the scientific community findings that refute Gore's statements.
|
|
|
|
Post by ascendinglark on Oct 13, 2007 20:49:35 GMT
There was a great editorial in the New York Post yesterday which said that Gore should be furious at having been lumped together with such previous Nobel winners as Yasser Arafat and Jimmy Carter, and should sue them for defamation of character.
I tend to agree with them. Nobel Peace Prizes, thanks to the inverted values of bird-brained leftists, are no longer worth the paper they're written on.
I wonder if the judges gave him special credits for all the millions he's been making from this whole carbon-offset trading scam.
|
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Oct 13, 2007 21:22:54 GMT
Yeah but these guys views Arafat and Carter as heroes, so he's blissfully unaware of the real nature of the company he's keeping. Let's call it a 'No Bell' prize  One thing it isn't is 'Noble'. |
|
)
