The BBC's Charter and its Producers Guidelines state:
...'Due impartiality lies at the heart of the BBC. All programs and services should be open minded, fair and show a respect for truth? [BBC reports should] contain comprehensive, authoritative and impartial coverage of news and current affairs in the United Kingdom and throughout the world??
Wednesday 18th June 2008 BBC Radio has been running an incredibly long advert in cinema theatres - running to several minutes, many times the length of a usual 30 second advert. We don't know how much this cost - but, a cinema campaign for Doctor Who this year was reported to cost £500,000.
We also made our own 'back of an envelope' calculation with publicly available information: Carlton Screen Advertising, a company which sells advertising time in cinemas, give a quote of £136,000 for a one week, national exposure for a 30 second ad. Considering the BBC advert was close to five minutes long, running over several weeks, the cost could have been over £1 million although it's likely the BBC negotiated a vastly reduced rate.
Nevertheless - is it right to be spending our license fee money on costly ads like this?
Last Edit: Jun 18, 2008 17:14:17 GMT by Teddy Bear
At present, the BBC is only answerable to itself in deciding its standards and coverage. How does it measure up to what you consider good quality, and impartial and unbiased reporting as required by its charter? All TV viewers in the UK are forced by law to pay for this 'service'. Do you believe that what is received truly 'serves' the society, - or merely increases the problems within it?
Your perceptions of BBC output are important and welcome. Register and activate your account to be able to post