The BBC's Charter and its Producers Guidelines state:
...'Due impartiality lies at the heart of the BBC. All programs and services should be open minded, fair and show a respect for truth? [BBC reports should] contain comprehensive, authoritative and impartial coverage of news and current affairs in the United Kingdom and throughout the world??
The BBC likes to present itself as the world’s most professional broadcaster, using its reputation to justify the billions of pounds it receives from the licence fee. Strange, then, that a corporation which boasts such well-resourced training facilities should need to pay a private company to train its ‘talent’. Even stranger that Jay Hunt, the £280,000-a-year Controller of BBC1, should help to run the company on the side, and not regard it as an obvious conflict of interest.
BrightsparkTV, owned by Ms Hunt’s husband with her as company secretary (under her married name) and run from their home, contributed substantially to the family finances last year, helped by glowing public testimonies from BBC presenters.
At a time when the BBC is struggling to justify the sky-high salaries and expenses enjoyed by its executives, this surely reeks of waste and misjudgment.
At present, the BBC is only answerable to itself in deciding its standards and coverage. How does it measure up to what you consider good quality, and impartial and unbiased reporting as required by its charter? All TV viewers in the UK are forced by law to pay for this 'service'. Do you believe that what is received truly 'serves' the society, - or merely increases the problems within it?
Your perceptions of BBC output are important and welcome. Register and activate your account to be able to post