BBC and 'Common Purpose'

[stygian]

Has anyone noticed how much the BBC is paying for so-called 'training' of its employees by an organisation called Common Purpose?
The 'training' has no benefit to the license payer.
Common Purpose teach how to impose power beyond legal authority.
Those selected for training are chosen for their positions of influence and benefit to Common Purpose, not for the license payer.
Common Purpose creates networks among its 'graduates' so as to better implement the nulabor social re-engineering project.
Some claim that Common Purpose uses NLP - neurolinguistic programming - as part of its tools to control its graduates, or as part of its grooming of young people as potential leaders.
Has anyone anything to add?

[Teddy Bear]

Welcome Stygian.
This would certainly be an interesting facet to what the BBC sees as its 'development'.
Do you have any links to substantiate it?

[dazedandconfused]

I can't substantiate the fact that as an entire entity, the BBC sings to the tune of Common Purpose. I can however say without any doubt, that BBC business editor Robert Peston
is on the board of directors, of not just Common Purpose, but also another of Julia Middleton's created quangos, The Media Standards Trust.

[Teddy Bear]

Welcome D&C (I fixed that link for you - notice the code here is different than BBBC [no connection to BBC ] and works from the buttons above where you write.)

I see from a bit of googling that there is a little concern about this organisation and what they might be doing. Somebody was also trying to find out whether Mark Thompson had ever attended such a training course. The BBC itself ran an article about it A Secret Society? but that might have been a way to deflect criticism from the outset.

Certainly worth keeping an eye on it.

[stopcpdotcom]

Common Purpose is a change agent being used to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to implement New Labour's hidden EU communitarian agenda.

You can find out more about the Common Purpose media here: www.stopcp.com/cpmedia.php

[Teddy Bear]

Welcome StopCP...
You may well be right, and it wouldn't surprise me if it was the case. What actual proof exists that moves it from speculation or circumstantial to real evidence? You can see where some might think this is just another 'Conspiracy Theory'.

(By the way, there is quite a bit of overhanging text on the webpages. I am viewing it on Explorer with Vista. You might want to correct that for viewers to take it more seriously)

[thehighlandrebel]

When your children ask you who won the war, tell them the truth. Tell them the Nazis won as they were the founders of the EU as we can see in the dictatorship we are now in where nobody knows who's making our laws and nobody has any say if they don't like them and nobody can vote these people in or out.

The brainwashing department of the Fourth Reich is an insidious organisation called Common Purpose of which many of it's 'graduates' are employees of the BBC. The Nazi influence can be clearly seen through the incessant anti Semitism promoted by this organisation.

One man who did an excellent job of exposing Common Purpose was an ex RN Commander, Brian Gerrish, who's thought provoking You Tube videos keep getting pulled by the 'establishment' although some of his videos can be seen here.

www.equalparenting-bc.ca/news/eu-european-union.htm

Common Purpose is real. It is dangerous. It is evil. It is all around us although you cannot see it and the BBC is it's mouthpiece.

But it has a weak spot. The one thing they don't like is people exposing it and letting the people know the truth.
If we had more people like Brian Gerrish then people would have a better understanding of why the likes of the BBC are pursuing the agenda they are on.

[Teddy Bear]

I moved your post here thr as it matches the subject matter better

[thehighlandrebel]

Thanks.

Must have missed the thread on CP.

[Teddy Bear]

The last post on it was nearly 2 years ago, so easy to miss.
It doesn't surprise me that there are a lot of questionable organisations who realising the value of the BBC to them, through one means or another are able to gain access and influence.
There is no question that those running the BBC have little moral character, much like hoodlums, and will run with whoever they think will serve their bid for power without consideration for any real human values.

[Teddy Bear]

It's gotten so that if I see ANY organisation with the word TRUST in it, and associated in some way with the BBC, I already know to mistrust it.

BBC Trust

IBT International Broadcasting Trust

and here - Media Standards Trust.

Sir David Bell and the public’s right to know

Yesterday Lord McAlpine, his frail voice crackling with anguish, described how BBC Newsnight’s false child abuse allegations against him had created a ‘legacy that can’t be repaired’.

‘It gets into your bones,’ the Tory peer said. ‘It makes you angry ... and it gets into your soul and you just think there’s something wrong with the world.’

Unsurprisingly, this terrible slur – based on misinformation supplied to the BBC by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism – has had tumultuous consequences.

The Director General has resigned, the BBC, its reputation for journalistic integrity shattered, is in chaos and countless individuals, including members of the BIJ, face paying substantial libel damages.

Which is why the Mail believes there is over-riding public interest in our decision to publish today an investigation into Sir David Bell, who is one of the trustees of the BIJ, and more pertinently into his role as assessor to the Leveson Inquiry into press standards.

For today we reveal that Bell is a leading member of an incestuous body called Common Purpose which has direct or indirect links to two other Leveson assessors.

It was Common Purpose’s founder who, with Bell, set up the Media Standards Trust which has played such a prominent role in the Leveson Inquiry.

It was the Media Standards Trust, chaired by Bell, which set up Hacked Off – whose luminaries include those sexual incontinents Max Mosley, Hugh Grant and Steve Coogan – and boasts, with justification, of substantially broadening the remit of the Leveson Inquiry.

It was also Bell’s Media Standards Trust which conducted a scurrilously shoddy report on the Press Complaints Commission and awarded a prestigious journalism prize to a writer who, it emerged, had made up his articles.

Indeed, the Mail’s investigation paints a picture of how a small, intertwined nexus of Left-of-centre individuals – some with links to Ofcom, the media regulator, and virtually all with links to Bell – have sought to exert huge influence on the inquiry.

We also reveal that Bell is a trustee of a charitable trust that has donated huge sums of money to the Media Standards Trust that he set up.

All of which we believe raises profoundly disturbing questions about the suitability of Bell as an assessor and the impact this may have had on the objectivity and neutrality of the inquiry itself.

The Mail is acutely aware of the seriousness of publishing this investigation. We know all too well that our enemies will accuse us of being aggressively defensive in a bid to pre-empt the outcome of the Leveson report, which is due any week now.

But in the light of the scandal engulfing the BBC, we passionately believe in the public’s right to know about a senior Leveson assessor’s role in it.
Let us stress that Lord Justice Leveson has no links to Common Purpose and is a man of integrity who has conducted his inquiry with impartiality.
However we make no apology for carrying this investigation. Newspapers have a duty to ask embarrassing questions about the powerful and the self-important people who know best.

The Mail has one final observation: if some form of statutory regulation is introduced because of Leveson, you can bet your life it will be elitist liberals such as Bell who decide what is in the ‘public interest’ and what newspapers should be allowed to print.

The consequences of this for both a press that has been free of political control for over 300 years and the public’s right to know doesn’t bear thinking about.

[vandamme]

Search for Brian Gerrish on Youtube:





He IS the man that has flushed out the Common Purpose folk and hence BBC.
Also check out Julia Middleton:

www.commonpurpose.org.uk/about/governance/julia-middleton

She has trained most of the ilk in the BBC.

[Teddy Bear]

Hey Van - good to see you

[Teddy Bear]

An update to this thread and the website of Brian Gerrish that is exposing what it can of this dubious clan.

What has happened to Common Purpose?

Following the exposure of Common Purpose in the Leveson Inquiry and the subsequent campaign to gag the press and media in Britain via the Media Standards Trust and their offshoot the Hacked Off Campaign, Common Pupose and leaders Sir David Bell and Julia MIddleton seem to have disappeared.

Despite ever increasing criticism of the devious and bullying nature of Hacked Off - an organisation campaigning for honesty and transparency but which fails to declare its own funders, there has been a wall of press and media silence over Bell, Middleton and Common Purpose itself. In fact, the silence since the massive exposure of Common Purpose by the Daily Mail, Telegraph and Sun has been deafening. Could a "D Notice' or state gagging order have been issued we wonder?

Whatever the case, Common Purpose drives on, and is now supported by a web of organisations, social enterprises, NGOs, charities and others promoting 'leadership' together with empowerment through applied behavioural psychology. The battle for our minds now includes government Nudging, Happiness and Mindfulness delivered in the covert drip drip drip of an anaesthetic.

In the NHS we have witnessed the deliberate neglect and deaths of thousands of patients. The NHS management responsible under Sir David Nicholson shows no remorse or guilt, and certainly no one has resigned. Why should the big man? he was only carrying out his masters orders, and David Cameron MP has backed him to the hilt. The implication is that the NHS is now controlled by low-empathy and 're-framed' individuals who see the old and seriously sick as detrimental to high profits or the efficient working of the State. Nazi Germany anyone?

The core of the rot in the NHS is the central Common Purpose Working Group. As usual a body which does not declare its members, for which minutes of meetings seem to have gone astray and about which simple questions have resulted in lies and conflicting information emanating from within the beast of the NHS.

Why? We will continue to dig to find out, but the path seems to be leading to the deliberate 'killing off' of those useless eaters who stand no chance of becoming 'future leaders' in the transformed world so desired in the rewired consciousness of future leaders.