The BBC's Charter and its Producers Guidelines state:
...'Due impartiality lies at the heart of the BBC. All programs and services should be open minded, fair and show a respect for truth? [BBC reports should] contain comprehensive, authoritative and impartial coverage of news and current affairs in the United Kingdom and throughout the world??
How does the BBC measure up to its charter?
BBC 'Breaches No-Advertising Rules' to tune of £6m
The BBC has received almost £6 million in sponsorship in the past five years, according to figures obtained by The Daily Telegraph.
The statistics, released under the Freedom of Information Act, will fuel claims from rival broadcasters that the corporation is introducing advertising "through the back door".
Since 2003, the BBC has struck sponsorship deals with the likes of Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble and Asda for 25 live events, including Children in Need, Sports Personality of the Year and Proms in the Park.
The corporation claims its sponsorship packages, in which companies are promised credits on air, are legitimate because the money is contributing to the cost of staging events, not programmes.
However, ITV has accused the BBC of breaking its no-advertising rules.
At present, the BBC is only answerable to itself in deciding its standards and coverage. How does it measure up to what you consider good quality, and impartial and unbiased reporting as required by its charter? All TV viewers in the UK are forced by law to pay for this 'service'. Do you believe that what is received truly 'serves' the society, - or merely increases the problems within it?
Your perceptions of BBC output are important and welcome. Register and activate your account to be able to post