Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 20, 2010 15:56:30 GMT
Consider the troubling dynamics of this story.
First it shows a demented broadcaster that has no problem inventing a role where he admits to an illegal act. Presumably thinking that this will create sympathy and show himself as compassionate.
It shows the demented world of the BBC that this broadcaster has inhabited and prospered in, to where it can be considered desirable to air such a story.
It shows the BBC has no qualms about making the public pay twice - first to support their rubbish and personal agendas in defiance of their charter, and again for the wasted police time and future punishment if that is brought against this twisted soul.
The best to be done is to privatise the BBC and let them have to make it in the real world.
Ray Gosling is 'to be charged with wasting police time'. But why didn't the BBC check his claims?
By Andrew M Brown Society Last updated: August 20th, 2010
Earlier this year Ray Gosling, the veteran BBC broadcaster, announced in a local TV programme that he’d smothered a former lover because the man had Aids and was suffering. Mr Gosling, 71, was filmed on the East Midlands Inside Out show, as he strolled through a cemetery delivering a piece to camera.
“Maybe this is the time to share a secret that I’ve kept for quite a long time,” he said. “I killed someone once. He’d been my lover and he got Aids.” After the hospital doctor explained there was nothing more he could do for the patient, Gosling said he picked up a pillow and smothered him to death. Later, Mr Gosling went on the Today programme to talk to Sarah Montague about it. He was arrested soon after that on suspicion of murder.
Today Mr Gosling is expected to be charged with wasting police time. “Hundreds of hours of officers’ time has been spent investigating Mr Gosling’s claim and they have not been able to find any information to substantiate it,” a source “close to the police” tells The Times today.
Apparently Keir Starmer, the DPP, has approved the decision to charge Mr Gosling with wasting police time – for which the maximum sentence is six months inside.
“It is surprising that more checks were not carried out before these very serious allegations were allowed to be broadcast,” the source adds.
Is it really that surprising that the BBC did not do more to check the claims? I’m not sure it is, really: Ray Gosling has such a strong history with the corporation and is greatly respected. He’s one of us, in the BBC sense. Although his career had stalled somewhat in recent years, any longtime listener to Radio Four will be familiar with his soft, Midlands tones, oozing compassion.
He’s certainly a likeable broadcaster with a natural style and a warm personality that comes across strongly. But the main thing is that his liberal credentials are impeccable – he’s a long-serving activist for gay rights, for example, and he liked to make programmes that celebrated ordinary people. Possibly senior BBC executives did not notice his confession, perhaps they trusted him – or perhaps they didn’t dare question a respected broadcaster.
First it shows a demented broadcaster that has no problem inventing a role where he admits to an illegal act. Presumably thinking that this will create sympathy and show himself as compassionate.
It shows the demented world of the BBC that this broadcaster has inhabited and prospered in, to where it can be considered desirable to air such a story.
It shows the BBC has no qualms about making the public pay twice - first to support their rubbish and personal agendas in defiance of their charter, and again for the wasted police time and future punishment if that is brought against this twisted soul.
The best to be done is to privatise the BBC and let them have to make it in the real world.
Ray Gosling is 'to be charged with wasting police time'. But why didn't the BBC check his claims?
By Andrew M Brown Society Last updated: August 20th, 2010
Earlier this year Ray Gosling, the veteran BBC broadcaster, announced in a local TV programme that he’d smothered a former lover because the man had Aids and was suffering. Mr Gosling, 71, was filmed on the East Midlands Inside Out show, as he strolled through a cemetery delivering a piece to camera.
“Maybe this is the time to share a secret that I’ve kept for quite a long time,” he said. “I killed someone once. He’d been my lover and he got Aids.” After the hospital doctor explained there was nothing more he could do for the patient, Gosling said he picked up a pillow and smothered him to death. Later, Mr Gosling went on the Today programme to talk to Sarah Montague about it. He was arrested soon after that on suspicion of murder.
Today Mr Gosling is expected to be charged with wasting police time. “Hundreds of hours of officers’ time has been spent investigating Mr Gosling’s claim and they have not been able to find any information to substantiate it,” a source “close to the police” tells The Times today.
Apparently Keir Starmer, the DPP, has approved the decision to charge Mr Gosling with wasting police time – for which the maximum sentence is six months inside.
“It is surprising that more checks were not carried out before these very serious allegations were allowed to be broadcast,” the source adds.
Is it really that surprising that the BBC did not do more to check the claims? I’m not sure it is, really: Ray Gosling has such a strong history with the corporation and is greatly respected. He’s one of us, in the BBC sense. Although his career had stalled somewhat in recent years, any longtime listener to Radio Four will be familiar with his soft, Midlands tones, oozing compassion.
He’s certainly a likeable broadcaster with a natural style and a warm personality that comes across strongly. But the main thing is that his liberal credentials are impeccable – he’s a long-serving activist for gay rights, for example, and he liked to make programmes that celebrated ordinary people. Possibly senior BBC executives did not notice his confession, perhaps they trusted him – or perhaps they didn’t dare question a respected broadcaster.