Post by indikit on Jul 7, 2007 19:02:26 GMT
Here's the BBC report:-
Needless to say the BBC report focuses on police brutality against the terrorists rather than the terrorists brutality against bystanders, by using 'emotional' descriptors such as:
"There are gasps and profanities from the passengers as the camera focuses on him as he is dragged along the ground by the police, his hands behind his back in cuffs. His clothes are all but burnt off, his skin and hair is scorched."
The BBC aim is of course is to suggest the gasps and profanities aren't being aimed at the horror of seeing a burning jeep or at the terrorists - but at the police, because the public are of course reacting to the police brutality, just like our good ol lefty BBC would want them too.
Dragging away a terrorist in cuffs while his skin is burnt off is of course completely wrong. He should have been floated off the scene by a thousand pink doves carrying him in a 100% pure duck down stretcher. But then the BBC could possibly have got the police there for animal cruelty or that the duck down hadn't been plucked in a Halaal way.
The report continues with:
"The most dramatic images are those of Kafeel Ahmed, 27, from Bangalore, India. He is still in a critical condition in a specialist burns unit at Glasgow Royal Infirmary after suffering 90% burns."
90% burns? Good. Shame he didn't complete the other 10%. But of course we are all supposed to weep for him.
"Dr Abdullah, from Iraq, is seen being led away by police after he was doused with CS gas."
Nobody was sprayed with CS Gas, this is just BBC wishful thinking. Someone please tell me how the BBC can continue to refute the fact that that are nothing but a bunch of terrorist sympathizers with a lefty attitude toward anything that isn't attempting to blowing us up.
Needless to say the BBC report focuses on police brutality against the terrorists rather than the terrorists brutality against bystanders, by using 'emotional' descriptors such as:
"There are gasps and profanities from the passengers as the camera focuses on him as he is dragged along the ground by the police, his hands behind his back in cuffs. His clothes are all but burnt off, his skin and hair is scorched."
The BBC aim is of course is to suggest the gasps and profanities aren't being aimed at the horror of seeing a burning jeep or at the terrorists - but at the police, because the public are of course reacting to the police brutality, just like our good ol lefty BBC would want them too.
Dragging away a terrorist in cuffs while his skin is burnt off is of course completely wrong. He should have been floated off the scene by a thousand pink doves carrying him in a 100% pure duck down stretcher. But then the BBC could possibly have got the police there for animal cruelty or that the duck down hadn't been plucked in a Halaal way.
The report continues with:
"The most dramatic images are those of Kafeel Ahmed, 27, from Bangalore, India. He is still in a critical condition in a specialist burns unit at Glasgow Royal Infirmary after suffering 90% burns."
90% burns? Good. Shame he didn't complete the other 10%. But of course we are all supposed to weep for him.
"Dr Abdullah, from Iraq, is seen being led away by police after he was doused with CS gas."
Nobody was sprayed with CS Gas, this is just BBC wishful thinking. Someone please tell me how the BBC can continue to refute the fact that that are nothing but a bunch of terrorist sympathizers with a lefty attitude toward anything that isn't attempting to blowing us up.
