|
Post by Teddy Bear on Apr 23, 2012 20:53:04 GMT
The Telegraph have this article today Leading British Muslim leader faces war crimes charges in Bangladesh Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin, director of Muslim spiritual care provision in the NHS, a trustee of the major British charity Muslim Aid and a central figure in setting up the Muslim Council of Britain, fiercely denies any involvement in a number of abductions and “disappearances” during Bangladesh’s independence struggle in the 1970s. He says the claims are “politically-motivated” and false.
Now if the BBC ever get around to reporting this, and doubtless they are aware of it as they are also involved in the story, my guess is they will perpetuate the theme that Mueen-Uddin is claiming. Whereas if you read the whole Telegraph article the sense that he’s completely guilty is fairly laid out. When I read this paragraph Mr Mueen-Uddin, then a journalist on the Purbodesh newspaper in Dhaka, was a member of a fundamentalist party, Jamaat-e-Islami, which supported Pakistan in the war. In the closing days, as it became clear that Pakistan had lost, he is accused of being part of a collaborationist Bangla militia, the Al-Badr Brigade, which rounded up, tortured and killed prominent citizens to deprive the new state of its intellectual and cultural elite. it occurred to me that the BBC wouldn’t have anything to worry about then, except they probably consider themselves our ‘intellectual and cultural elite’. Presumably once they’ve sorted out how they’re going to word this story we’ll eventually get an article from them. I'll keep my eye on what they report when they do.
|
|
|
Post by thehighlandrebel on Aug 24, 2012 20:15:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Aug 24, 2012 21:53:28 GMT
Excellent link THR. A very worthwhile read.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Nov 3, 2013 18:33:13 GMT
The Bangladesh war crimes tribunal has now found Mueen-Uddin guilty of multiple murders and sentenced him to death in absentia. It's alleged he murdered nine university professors, three physicians and six journalists - including a BBC reporter.
Sanaul Huq, the Inspector-General of Bangladesh's national police force, who is co-ordinating the ICT investigation, told The Mail on Sunday: 'They abducted an eye doctor, and then gouged his eyes out before killing him and dumping his body.
'They abducted a cardiologist and cut out his heart before killing him and dumping his body.
'They kidnapped a woman journalist, and cut her breasts off before killing her. Her decomposing body was later found with her breasts cut off.
Notwithstanding, not only has the UK government refused to extradite him, he's somewhat of a celebrity here, and has met Prince Charles on quite a few occasions. He's a former director of Muslim Spiritual Care in the NHS, which pretty much sums up the lunacy of this country, especially considering he was quite vocal in drumming up protests against Salman Rushdie for his book The Satanic Verses. He's held quite a few other posts too as you'll read below.
Well in May, 17 days after the Telegraph article, the BBC did run one with a video clip. While the video does tell us of some of the accusations, it also has footage of those claiming the trial would just be a political exercise and undermined whatever findings it would come to.
However the article with the video tells us very little of the real substance of the story. Considering one of those he was accused of murdering was a BBC reporter, it shows that in following its agenda, the BBC has no loyalty, or even common decency.
Here's what the BBC tell us (2 minute video available on website), followed by the Mail's story today.
Here's today's Mail story:
Let's see if the BBC update their original and only article, and if and when - what they tell us.
|
|
|
Post by Teddy Bear on Nov 3, 2013 21:00:22 GMT
First - I've found a few more BBC articles related to this story. The problem finding them earlier was they had spelled the perpetrator's name slightly differently so it didn't show up on the search. However, none of the articles appeared before May 2nd, 17 days AFTER it was first reported by Andrew Gilligan in the Telegraph. Before focussing on how the BBC report this story it is worth reading the whole of his article from last April. Bear in mind he is in Dhaka interviewing the families of those who were victims of Mueen-Uddin, and who could positively identify him. Why should they have named this man out of all the millions? Here's Gilligan's first article: I showed above one of the articles that the BBC published on May 2nd. Here's the other from the same day without video. See for yourself, what does it appear that the BBC is doing? Now it could be said that in advance of any trial the BBC were merely reporting any defence that was put to them. Bear in mind they have journalists in Bangladesh and could have easier interviewed the witnesses, unlike the Telegraph which had to pay to send Gilligan out there. Not doing it however is what the BBC calls 'balance' and 'impartial'. So let's see how they report the story following the verdict. Just the headline itself already shows they are doing their best to confuse any reader that might happen upon it - Bangladesh finds UK and US accused guilty of war crimes. The latest is not much better with: UK and US nationals guilty of Bangladesh war crimesIt would have been too simple to make it known, like the Mail did today that Muslim leader living in Britain sentenced to death by hanging for war crimes in BangladeshHere's the BBC article from today - any doubt that they are making sure the public will believe this man is innocent, and it is the Bangladesh government which is suspect. Let's face it, the Bangladesh government is not nearly as extremist or militant as the Pakistani, so who do you think the dhimmi BBC will favour?
|
|