The BBC's Charter and its Producers Guidelines state:
...'Due impartiality lies at the heart of the BBC. All programs and services should be open minded, fair and show a respect for truth? [BBC reports should] contain comprehensive, authoritative and impartial coverage of news and current affairs in the United Kingdom and throughout the world??
How does the BBC measure up to its charter?
NO, CHARLOTTE CHURCH - SYRIAN CIVIL WAR WASN'T CAUSED BY AGW
The BBC seem to delight in inviting various 'celebrities' on the Question Time panel that nobody would really believe have a firm grasp of reality, much less basic common sense and intelligence. Yet the common thread that connects all of these celebrities is that they will all further the slant the BBC want to present to further their own agenda.
As last week's presence of Charlotte Church will confirm. Besides adhering to the left wing mindset perpetuated by the BBC, she shows her conviction on the dangers of climate change. James Delingpole picks up on this facet of her 'performance'.
Charlotte Church, the millionaire former pop starlet who has now reinvented herself as an Occupy-style revolutionary, was on BBC Question Time the other day telling anyone who would listen that the Syrian conflict had been caused by “climate change.”
At present, the BBC is only answerable to itself in deciding its standards and coverage. How does it measure up to what you consider good quality, and impartial and unbiased reporting as required by its charter? All TV viewers in the UK are forced by law to pay for this 'service'. Do you believe that what is received truly 'serves' the society, - or merely increases the problems within it?
Your perceptions of BBC output are important and welcome. Register and activate your account to be able to post