Post by Teddy Bear on Dec 15, 2009 16:34:40 GMT
Yesterday's BBC Radio London's Breakfast Show apparently ran a story about the recent attack on Italian PM Berlusconi. The presenters invited Guardian Political Editor Michael White to comment, and somehow this became a completely false and baseless attack on IDF forces that went unchallenged.
Honest Reporting picks up the story:
Honest Reporting picks up the story:
Guardian Ed: "In Israel They Murder Each Other a Great Deal"
"The Israeli Defense Forces murder people because they don't like their political style..."
What does the IDF have to do with the recent assault on Italian PM Sylvio Berlusconi? Absolutely nothing. But that didn't stop The Guardian's Political Editor Michael White from making the following comment during a discussion on BBC Radio London's Breakfast Show concerning the physical vulnerability of political leaders:
(The full segment from the BBC Radio London Breakfast Show with Joanne Good and Paul Ross, 8am, Monday 14 Dec. can be heard by clicking here (3 mins 30 secs in) or here for a limited time only on the BBC website at approximately 1hr 16 mins in.)
These are extremely serious and baseless accusations and perhaps offer a disturbing insight into the mindsets of The Guardian's senior staff as well as those BBC presenters who simply grunted in agreement.
Does the IDF target terrorists and their leadership in order to defend Israeli citizens from terror attacks? Certainly. Does the IDF engage in deliberate murder in order to silence dissent in the same style as a police state or dictatorship? Certainly not.
Accusing the IDF of murdering people because they disagree with their "political style" is an absolutely outrageous slander. How can the paper's Political Editor represent The Guardian on a public platform, spreading slanderous accusations while expected to produce reliable and credible material in a mainstream newspaper?
"The Israeli Defense Forces murder people because they don't like their political style..."
What does the IDF have to do with the recent assault on Italian PM Sylvio Berlusconi? Absolutely nothing. But that didn't stop The Guardian's Political Editor Michael White from making the following comment during a discussion on BBC Radio London's Breakfast Show concerning the physical vulnerability of political leaders:
In Israel they murder each other a great deal. The Israeli Defense Forces murder people because they don't like their political style and what they've got to say and it only means that people more extreme come in and take their place.
(The full segment from the BBC Radio London Breakfast Show with Joanne Good and Paul Ross, 8am, Monday 14 Dec. can be heard by clicking here (3 mins 30 secs in) or here for a limited time only on the BBC website at approximately 1hr 16 mins in.)
These are extremely serious and baseless accusations and perhaps offer a disturbing insight into the mindsets of The Guardian's senior staff as well as those BBC presenters who simply grunted in agreement.
Does the IDF target terrorists and their leadership in order to defend Israeli citizens from terror attacks? Certainly. Does the IDF engage in deliberate murder in order to silence dissent in the same style as a police state or dictatorship? Certainly not.
Accusing the IDF of murdering people because they disagree with their "political style" is an absolutely outrageous slander. How can the paper's Political Editor represent The Guardian on a public platform, spreading slanderous accusations while expected to produce reliable and credible material in a mainstream newspaper?