|
Post by indikit on Aug 1, 2007 18:37:08 GMT
Never is there a better time to be middle class than now. With the Olympics comes an orgy of ruling class leeches with made up phoney jobs to suck dry the cash cow that is the olympic games. And all in the name of Political Correctness of course. And you can guarantee when and if the olympics actually happen, nothing will work, the whole lot will fall down around our ears. www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=472216&in_page_id=1770
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 5, 2007 19:35:15 GMT
My comments on this thread: www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/07/centre_of_attention.html#commentsanchorAnother bit of BBC propoganda from the Ministry of Bullshit, as they have the nerve to declare the following about the BBC World Service: "It boosts Britain by refusing to boost Britain." And that's spot on. We do not boost, we do not label, we do not "belong" and we certainly do not take sides. We pursue "neutrality" with a vengeance. So much so that it's the only thing we're not neutral about - I'm never sure whether our audiences agree though." How sickening is this? It's like listening to a serial killer preaching about how much work he does for charity. I posted a comment which I can pretty much guarantee won't be posted, even though I made some attempt at being polite when I would much rather have posted the comments above: "I'm never sure whether our audiences agree though." Which proves conclusively that the BBC never listen to a word of complaint against them, because if Liliane Landor bothered to listen to one complaint in a hundred she'd find that there were plenty of people who disagree. We're totally aware that the BBC "doesn't boost Britain" as she admits. Instead it demonizes and demoralizes it. How anyone can possibly think that we should be proud of a service with the word "British" int the title who's sole aim seems to promote any cause or aim that is ant-British, should apply for a journalist post at the BBC immediately.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 25, 2007 21:18:34 GMT
Andrew Neil, who presents the Daily Politics show on BBC2 and This Week on BBC1, was contemptuous. "All 16,000 of us are going to be sent to re-education camps, a bit like Pol Pot's Cambodia," he told his viewers.
Comparing a licence fee paid piss up and smokescreen meeting to the worlds biggest genocide, all I can say is...Let's just hope that for once in his career Andrew Neil is proved totally right.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 25, 2007 21:21:59 GMT
With an IQ of 63 that would make her twice as intelligent as the ammoral freaks from the Beeb that filmed her.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 20, 2007 10:55:39 GMT
The BBC Trust released its own statement saying that the latest revelations “shows further deeply disappointing evidence of insufficient understanding amongst certain staff of the standards of accuracy and honesty expected, and inadequate editorial controls to ensure compliance”."
The longest way of saying "The BBC are liars" I have ever heard.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 30, 2007 23:46:03 GMT
On the BBC editors blog, it's a Jolly Hockeysticks explanation. "Yes, we cocked up."
Oh ha ha ha. Those clowns at the BBC. Cocking up when it comes to the P.Ms last speech in Parliament.
Of course there wouldn't be any sackings Teddy. It's the BBC. But woe betide anyone who cuts short Alan Johnstons last speech - if he gets one. Because then we can be sure...heads will roll.
Pun intended.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 10, 2007 4:28:00 GMT
Blue Peter? Is this middle class flagship still going?
I hear that it was getting increasingly hard for the producers to find kids willing to sit and be indoctrinated by this leftie toddler training pap so they had to recruit some ex page 3 model to front it.
I could be wrong as I never, ever, ever watch the BBC.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 20, 2006 23:14:24 GMT
Barron is clearly the bitch in this particular TV relationship. Bet he had Paxman's tea ready the instant the show went off-air.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 20, 2006 23:11:49 GMT
"They do not in any way impact on his ability to be a first class entertainer on BBC television."
By the sounds of that comment, Norton isn't the only one taking drugs.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 20, 2006 23:24:08 GMT
This is inverted racism at it's most rampant. And what the flying f*** is a "diversity czar". I must have missed that one on the boards at the job center. I mean, isn't that the first post you'd create if you were setting up a TV station who's service was supposed to be ENTERTAINMENT.
Diversity being the buzzword for minority at the beeb. Czar obviously being thrown in to make the successful applicant feel like they were an emperor or something, rather than somebody with a stupid job.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 20, 2006 23:16:56 GMT
The BBC's justification for funding Emin would have been the same mantra you hear daily when they're handing out license payers cash like it's going out of fashion:
"One of us, one of us, one of us..."
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Apr 25, 2007 0:16:44 GMT
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/06/nlyons06.xmlGordon Brown is hand picking his team and placing them in high powered positions for his up-coming prime-ministerial position. How f***** scary is that? This is borderline a dictatorship. And guess what great impartial TV service has just dumped a great big fat Gordon Brown cuckoo in the nest? Apparently the guy knows nothing about broadcasting. So he should get along famously with the rest of the BBC staff then.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Apr 24, 2007 22:59:21 GMT
Yes you're right Teddy, the Orwellian mantra that no doubt permeates the BBC hallways:
"We are all about minority. But some are more minority than others."
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Apr 24, 2007 20:59:06 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/03/white_faces_on_screen_2.htmlTim Levells 'right-on' explanation as to why there is a dispraportionate amount of black faces on the VOX POP sections of Children's Newsround reads like some kind of conjurers trick: Now you see the rabbit - Now you don't. It's just typical BBC coached double-speak to convince us that what we are seeing is merely an accidental illusion and not deliberate bias. The simple, bottom line explanation for why there are more black faces than white on a programme like Newsround is because Tim - just like many of his BBC cohorts suffer from a serious dose of white middle class guilt. They have this in-built knee jerk reaction to ethnic minorities which is in itself latent racism. They see all minority groups as marginalized and incapable, in so far that need preferential treatment over us the lucky over-priviledged majority. If there was any truth in this altrustic attempt to minoritize the entirity of the British media, why doesn't Tim just hand his job over to an ethnic minority. Not only would it assuage his own terminal middle class guilt, it would relieve our contempt of his kind too. I think what's really sad, is that some people are actually fooled into thinking that because this blog is allowed to go uncensored (except my entry probably) that means the powers-that-be at the BBC are actually listening? No. They are just trying to give the impression they are listening, when all they ever hear are the sounds of their own over-inflated, self important politics. Now you see the rabbit - Now you don't.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Apr 24, 2007 23:04:42 GMT
I wonder how Reynolds found his way here, as much as I wonder how many other BBC employees read this site.
No doubt Martin Bellam is the sort of egoist that is typical of your average BBC employee, who will find his way here once he types his own name into the Google search engine to find out how he's doing in the hall of fame.
Hello Martin! Your BBC medallions are in the post.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Apr 24, 2007 19:47:20 GMT
Would anyone take the opinions of a designer in the employ of the BBC seriously when he attempts to defend them? Well if you can bare to read this confused and pointless article posted by one of it's 'designers' then I'm sure the answer is no:- www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2007/03/my_biased_view_of_the_biased_b_7.phpAs you would expect from anyone who has been nicely indoctrinated with the liberal mindset of the BBC - and is also in their lucrative employ - it's clear that all this BBC bias is merely an illusion. They are in fact poor helpless professionals merely confused by all the conflicting opinions that they do their very best to listen to. What better example to disprove BBC bias than Mr Bellams experience with...uhm...designing a web page for a Doctor Who episode. I don't know about you people but I'm totally won over. I will renew my TV licence instantly. I didn't know they had it so tough with all those vicious e-mails they have to deal with from people who don't like Daleks being sprayed gold. Maybe if Bellam had stuck a veil over the top of one of their metal heads he wouldn't have to defend his beloved institution in the first place. Because anyone who attacked the Daleks then could just have been passed off as racist. There is absolutely no meat on the bones of this guys article whatsoever. A serious case of someone biting off LESS than he can chew in a desperate attempt to suck up to his employers.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 20, 2006 22:09:24 GMT
What does it take to actually stop the BBC continuing to enforce their egocentric political opinions and willful destruction of the populace at the hands of the malignant few that the BBC champion? Personally, I believe that endless discourse is futile. As are complaints. The BBC will never listen to the many because these voices are drowned out by the cries of the few. And as has been proved over and over again, all complaints to the BBC are met with the conditioned response of which can be broken down thus: A) If we offended you (who are not one of us), you are wrong. B) If we offended you (who are one of us), you are right. The BBC is an institution riddled with middle-class nepotists, who possess at best the most rudimentary skills in programme making, and at worst an aptitude for employing the marginalized over the talented. BBC staff are not there to entertain or inform. They are there to enforce. Enforce their own sense of importance upon us. Enforce their own political ideologies upon as, and worst of all to enforce their middle class guilt upon us. Yes, you see such is the social and financial privilege of your average BBC employee, such is the simplicity of life, the big house in the home counties, back-packing trips to the Philippines, ski-ing holidays with Mummy and Daddy, that they start to feel...well...a little guilty. After all, isn't it wrong to have it so easy when so many people have it tough? So to make themselves feel better about their own privilege, they champion the rights of those who seemingly have none. 'Seemingly' being the operative word. Because as so much of the media has been infiltrated by these nepotistic self-serving leeches, the last two decades of TV have been NOTHING but the championing of 'the little people'. Until the little people have been afforded so much free reign and privilege (at our cost) they are almost on a par with the BBC types who have crusaded for them. And when the BBC lackys are not done televising their plight, they are employing the plighted, to help THEMSELVES televise their plight. And meanwhile, YOU, the license payer. The voiceless. The NEW minority, are expected to just sit their in pained silence, happily funding their selfish ideologies. An ideology that can have no end, because to do so would mean that those who seek to promote it would no longer gain financially from it's existence. And if there's one thing middle class media types like to promote more than their own politics, it's their own wealth. So why are you funding it? Isn't it as simple as this: STOP PAYING YOUR LICENSE FEE. Because your fear of the BBC being able to legally MAKE you pay the license fee is the only thing they have left. Believe me, the BBCs powers to come after those that refuse to pay the license fee are so weak, so feeble, that if hundreds of thousands of people just suddenly stopped paying, this great, corrupt and politically dangerous machine would come to a grinding halt. Do you think the likes of John Simpson would champion radical Muslim causes over his own pay check? If the BBC saw that TV viewers en masse were unwilling to put their hands into their pockets to fund the continuation of this dangerous, arrogant propaganda that is BBC TV, every minority cause - that is endangering the fabric and lives of the majority, would be abandoned. Like rats leaving a sinking ship. I encourage everyone to stop the BBC - not by holding a mirror up their blind faces - but by keeping your hard earned money away from their undeserved wage packets. Here is a web site to assist you in that very thing: www.tvlicensing.biz/ I haven't paid the license fee in 20 years at every single address I've ever lived at. The BBC - for all their threatening letters have never so much as touched me. Any licensing Gestapo agent who knocks at my door is told to 'get lost'. They HAVE to get lost. They have NO powers of entry. NONE at all. Anyone the BBC has ever prosecuted (inflated figures available from the BBC fear-inducing TV licensing web site), have only been those people IDIOT enough to invite BBC Gestapo agents into their house to look at the TV set they're not paying for. Is it really so, that we have so many stupid and cowardly people in the UK that the BBC can continue to fund their effrontery? Are you one of them?
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 20, 2006 22:57:54 GMT
"Morning all. Whatever job you do on station, make sure this week, you broadcast to DAVE AND SUE - people in their fifties. ONLY put on callers sounding in the 45-64 range...I don't want to hear really elderly voices... ONLY talk about things that are positive and appealing to people in this age range... ONLY do caller round ups about people in this age range. MAKE SURE YOU PLAY 6-8 DISCS AN HOUR - YES 6-8 DISCS AN HOUR!! REMEMBER - even the older listeners (65+) are leaving us for more upbeat sounding stations.... If we don't, our business won't survive!! Our listeners will have died out and we won't have nurtured up any younger people...that's fact - not fiction... the RAJAR figures show this. Whatever your view of this policy, this is what the business needs, so please make sure you're doing the right thing. Any questions, just see me."
Well if this jolly-hocky-sticks memo puts paid to anything, it's material proof that the BBC care less about public service broadcasting and more about viewing figures. Mind you, this must be the ONLY mandate ever put into practise by the BBC that actually involves catering for the tastes of the majority over the minority.
I like the DAVE & SUE reference. Nice patronizing touch. I don't know why she didn't go the whole hog and just write "the plebs".
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 1, 2007 13:57:05 GMT
"Dimbleby sounds like the TV equivalent of a tenured college professor. Basically, they're just ticks. They get fatter and fatter with the blood of their hosts until they're burned off with a lighter."
I like that analogy. The last bit as it has a particularly satisfying visual attached to it.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 31, 2007 21:23:20 GMT
Dimbleby is a prime example of the sickening elite of the BBC. He sees himself as the royal family of the Beeb. A brainless, toffee nosed simpleton who couldn't even tell you what the average price is of a pint of milk.
The fact that these people try to preach to us about the world we live in, when they live in quite a different world altogether is sickening.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 31, 2007 21:24:31 GMT
Got an e-mail from Bob today. Looks like he's really going for it. So hopefully he will cull a few examples from this forum.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 22, 2007 15:03:18 GMT
This was posted on the biased BBC spot. As Teddy is the expert on this I hope he can start sending out the e-mails.
I'm going to e-mail the URL of this site to Bob Spink.
"This House is concerned that the BBC's new Charter, which took full effect from 1st January 2007, has so far failed to change both the perception of the Corporation's bias and its editorial and policy directions; and calls on the BBC's governing body to address these issues frankly and openly, particularly in respect of partiality on issues such as the European Union, and to publish a statement on how it intends to improve public trust in the BBC as a strictly impartial and much valued public service broadcaster."
Conservative MP Bob Spink has tabled the above motion in the House of Commons recently and he is looking for examples of BBC bias from the general public. He can be contacted via email at this address.
spinkr@parliament.uk
Get going people!!
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 10, 2007 4:23:31 GMT
It's the most intelligent and reasoned article I've ever read from Littlejohn. I admire him as much as I admire Melanie Phillips.
Are there only 2 journalists out there fighting the side of common sense in the entire establishment?
Uni campuses are just middle class breeding grounds, and of course all the easily indoctrinated over priviledged sons and daughters of the media that go there, will be nothing more than a chip-off-the-old-block of their parents.
Fattening themselves up for over paid positions in the media where they can continue living lives of self-indulged elitist excess, paid for off the backs of their soapboxing to the rest of us.
I hate knee jerk political assumptions, but Britain's left are gradually looking more and more like communists by the day. The BBC clearly the head of the communist party.
Sickening as ever.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 7, 2007 19:02:26 GMT
Here's the BBC report:-Needless to say the BBC report focuses on police brutality against the terrorists rather than the terrorists brutality against bystanders, by using 'emotional' descriptors such as: "There are gasps and profanities from the passengers as the camera focuses on him as he is dragged along the ground by the police, his hands behind his back in cuffs. His clothes are all but burnt off, his skin and hair is scorched." The BBC aim is of course is to suggest the gasps and profanities aren't being aimed at the horror of seeing a burning jeep or at the terrorists - but at the police, because the public are of course reacting to the police brutality, just like our good ol lefty BBC would want them too. Dragging away a terrorist in cuffs while his skin is burnt off is of course completely wrong. He should have been floated off the scene by a thousand pink doves carrying him in a 100% pure duck down stretcher. But then the BBC could possibly have got the police there for animal cruelty or that the duck down hadn't been plucked in a Halaal way. The report continues with: "The most dramatic images are those of Kafeel Ahmed, 27, from Bangalore, India. He is still in a critical condition in a specialist burns unit at Glasgow Royal Infirmary after suffering 90% burns." 90% burns? Good. Shame he didn't complete the other 10%. But of course we are all supposed to weep for him. "Dr Abdullah, from Iraq, is seen being led away by police after he was doused with CS gas." Nobody was sprayed with CS Gas, this is just BBC wishful thinking. Someone please tell me how the BBC can continue to refute the fact that that are nothing but a bunch of terrorist sympathizers with a lefty attitude toward anything that isn't attempting to blowing us up.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 8, 2007 22:55:17 GMT
Thanks bijan. Good to see you here, as it is good to read your postings on the biased BBC blog.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 7, 2007 22:21:14 GMT
Hi ascending lark. I think it's combining a Mac with Firefox that complicates things. I'll just right click and open in a new window in future. But when people post lots of links like the one above, I can't relink them all. I would relink to to where the original comments are made on the Haloscan Biased BBC Blog, but I have NO idea how to do that as it just comes up as a javascript action.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 7, 2007 22:13:20 GMT
Further information on this subject from a user called Bijan on the Biased BBC Blog. I've removed the links because the Biased BBC discussion boards condense all links beyond use. It also annoyingly opens the links when clicked in a small window that removes the URL description, so I can't cut and paste it from there either. Perhaps some of the users of the Biased BBC Blog could come up here and post the links themselves. Seems strange that not many of them use this forum considering it's wide open for topics to be created by the opposition themselves, rather than respond to topics being made by one person. Not that I don't wholeheartedly support the Biased BBC Blog of course. ************************ I have pieced together the entire sequence of BBC Media manipulation of the Glasgow Attack GLASGOW ATTACKS: HOW THE BBC RESHAPES THE TRUTH, AND INVENTS ITS OWN VERSION OF HISTORY (1) AIRBRUSHES OUT JOHN SMEATON John Smeaton is the best known member of the public who tackled one of the Glasgow terrorists. Smeaton has been acclaimed as the "Have A Go Hero." There is even a website dedicated to him www.johnsmeaton.com/The BBC’s problem is that John’s language and thinking was too close to how ordinary British people feel about Islamic terrorism .... CNN Interview: Real John Smeaton .... including his uncensored comments: "Allah, Something, Allah, Something Allah, (Allah-o-Akbar=God is Great) Every time He Threw a punch [at the policeman] he was saying Allah" ... & ... "The way some people feel about people, now you begin to understand" …. so at first the BBC tried to wash off Smeaton's political incorrectness ... BBC Interview: The Politically Correct John Smeaton but that apparently was not good enough ... so now they are looking to airbrush him out by labelling Michael Kerr who also tried to intervene at Glasgow as the "Have A Go Hero", all day today the BBC has been running a story on him as the "Have A Go Hero" Michael Kerr - Airport 'hero' injured in attack NOTE IN THE ABOVE ARTICLE THIS ABOUT KERR "He stepped in as the suspect attacked a policeman. Mr Kerr, 40, was punched in the face, lost several teeth and injured his leg as he fell." (2) BBC TRYS TO CLAIM THAT THE MAN HOLDING HIS BEATEN FACE IS BILAL ABDULLA WHEN IN FACT ITS MICHAEL KERR .... THEN WHEN IT DETERMINES IT IS MICHAEL KERR IT JUST EDITS HIM OUT OF THE VIDEO?! Here is the unedited footage showing Michael Kerr holding his face after being assulted by the terrorists ... UNEDITED BBC VIDEO SHOWING MAN ASSULTED BY TERRORISTS HOLDING FACE The unedited BBC footage trys to claim that the assaulted man is the terrorist Bilal Abdulla in what I believe was an effort to garner support for the terrorists being man handled by the Scottish police. But in fact the man shown holding his face was Michael Kerr! and the police are assisting him! Kerr has been beaten in the face by the terrorists. Within a day the BBC edits Kerr holding his face out of the footage. And the original video is replaced with follow up reports. EDITED BBC VIDEO the accompanying stealth edited article no longer mentions that the video shows “Dr Abdullah, from Iraq, is seen being led away by police after he was doused with CS gas." This is not only a totally incorrect manipulation of the facts - but (as was pointed out in the BBC Forum also typically poor BBC English - as one is not doused with CS gas one is sprayed with it.)
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 7, 2007 21:59:20 GMT
It's the link directly from the biased BBC news blog. For some reason they condense all links on postings so you can't cut and paste them. However, it's the same link I posted on the other thread outlining a different aspect of the same story. news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6278318.stm
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 7, 2007 18:38:39 GMT
I found this in one of the biased BBC comment blogs and thought it worth posting up here: ********************* IDIOTS AT THE BBC CANT GET SIMPLE FACTS RIGHT! END UP STEALTH EDITING GLASGOW VIDEO "Dr Abdullah, from Iraq, is seen being led away by police after he was doused with CS gas." First I am sickened by the reference to Dr Abdulla, As if Abdulla or Bilal Abdualla is not good enough for this f*kin excuse of an Islamic TERRORIST Second it isnt Abdulla that is being show walking away holding his face, ... and NO he wasnt doused wth CS gas .... its an innocent bystander that was punched in the face by Abdulla or his burnt PoS accomplice. news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol...stm?bw=bb& mp=wm Abdulla was wearing tan colored trusers - the man holding his face is wearing Jeans! I see that the BBC have now edited the sequence of the man holding his face out of the online video. They must have realsied that it was an innocent bystander hit by the terrorists and not one of their PoS terrorist friends. I am so angry with how the BBC constantly manipulates and hides the truth. With a bit of luck the original BBC video showing the man holding his face will turn up on YouTube and yet another BBC stealth edit will be shown up. ***************** On a minor note I wonder where the BBC employs it's writers from. "Dr Abdullah, from Iraq, is seen being led away by police after he was doused with CS gas." Since when does anyone get 'doused' with a gas? BBC - you spray gas and you douse a liquid. But the BBC hate the police and douse sounds worse than sprayed. They would have used 'poisoned' if they thought they could have got away with it.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 2, 2007 20:55:02 GMT
Those wonderfully impartial people at the BBC have set up a deal with Microsoft to ensure that their new iPlayer (A namesake rip off of a MAC creation) won't work for MAC users... "The BBC has been accused of forcing people to use Microsoft operating systems and has been threatened with a complaint to the European Commission," BBC News reports. The Beeb reports, "The charge concerns the use of Microsoft technology in the corporation's forthcoming iPlayer. The web service, set for launch later this year, allows viewers to watch shows up to 30 days after broadcast. The BBC has said it does intend to allow access to its content from computers with other operating systems [however] a statement from the organisation read: It is not possible to put an exact timeframe on when BBC iPlayer will be available for Mac users. However, we are working to ensure this happens as soon as possible and the BBC Trust will be monitoring progress on a six monthly basis." "The accusations against the BBC have been made by advocacy group the Open Source Consortium (OSC)," The Beeb reports. "'The BBC has a mandate to provide equal access to people irrespective of platform," said Mark Taylor, president of OSC. 'We don't think it is appropriate to lock people into a particular desktop technology.' The OSC has compared the situation to the BBC offering programmes that only work on certain makes of television." www.ipoddailynews.com/index.php/ipoddailynews/comments/14037/
|
|