|
Post by indikit on Aug 6, 2007 20:12:33 GMT
And don't forget the BBCs aim is to indoctrinate, not inform. Therefore their attitude is:
Do as we say, not what we do.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 5, 2007 21:42:09 GMT
4,000 PEOPLE A WEEK TRYING TO LEAVE UK Of course, to the BBC these will be all the racists they have been trying to protect us from for so long. And it certainly won't be any news worth repeating on their web-shite. But to anyone with skills, intelligence, and the desire for a good future, Britain is not the place to be.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 10, 2007 19:17:47 GMT
As an interesting personal experience of my own, I have recently been accused of being racist because of my anti-Islam views by someone I can only describe as an extreme left wing fanatic. He hates the police, thinks EVERY black person who is arrested is innocent, and is so anti-American it's embarrasing. His argument is that Islamophobia is purely for racists.
The saddest thing of all is that this guy is actually Jewish himself.
There is no hope - utterly no hope whatsoever for anyone on the extreme left. They are tantamount to a dangerous religion.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 21, 2007 18:57:16 GMT
You know what, this one statement on this message board sums it all up for me:
"Welcome to a country called Islam - coming in the next 25 years!"
And on that note, I think I'm going to bow out of all this BBC debate, and look after my own concerns. And my concern now is to find a country to bring my daughter up in, so the time she's in her 20's she won't have to walk around in a veil as a second class citizen.
I admire the way you guys keep this fight going. It's an admirable board. The Biased BBC blog too is a frontal assault on the BBC and a thorn in it's side. But that's all it is. A thorn. Stuck in the side of a giant white elephant that is the British Ruling class. Too many of them on that board just enjoy the opportunity to excercise their own intellects to 'debate' with BBC staff. I use apostrophes around the word 'debate' because you cannot convince the BBC that they are biased or of the inevitable slaughter they are leading this country too, any more than you can convince a Jehova's Witness that there is no god or a Muslim that there is no Allah. But it's a nice little distraction for the BBC. A tiny little cog grinding away against a mammoth machine. Creating little sparks that will never ignite anything. Because the British Public themselves are so impossible to inflame, unless it's something to do with losing the world cup.
This whole thing is beyond debate. It's now the dawn of an all out revolution. But we all know what will come of any civil disobedience that doesn't kowtow to Islam in this country. They'd be shooting white British rioters dead in the streets rather than have our black Muslim buddies served up the same aggression they've been serving us for years.
The BBC and it's cronies will succeed in turning this country into a nation of Islam, because nobody that has the power will stop them. Eventually it will be too late anyway, because all the powerful positions such as the media, the police force and politics will be over-run with this poisonous religion. They're being handed this country chunk by chunk.
There is a hypnotized sickness running through the middle classes, that they must appease aggressors, purely out of their own self-loathing. Reality is currently like living in a global zombie film. It doesn't matter how many of these liberal arse heads you knock down, there will be another twelve million to take their place. Infecting each other with one bite of their media controlled brains.
Pointless debate, on a hiding for nothing. Especially as the lazy, cowering masses that make up this country can put off their own ethnic cleansing until tomorrow, because Eastenders is on the telly and "I just want an easy life don't I?"
Don't worry. When the Muslims get their way and Sharia law is our new constitution; alcohol is banned; watching Big Brother will be punishable by stoning, and anything and everything the British take for granted is removed for them purely off the back of an Allah that doesn't exist, they can do what they do best. Complain and f**king well put up with it.
All it would take would be for a few million people to picket the streets right now. Refuse to pay their TV licence and the BBC and any institution like them would be over. How quaint and simple that will look in 20 years time when we're all forced to sit on grass mats and pray to a Mecca we don't care for.
I'll give the Muslims this. And the ONLY thing I'll give them. At least they actually get out there and DO something about what they believe in. Even if it is just blowing themselves to bits on a tube train, or flying passenger aircraft into skyscrapers. They're fighting a bunch of armchair warriors with REAL bombs. Real threats. Real actions. And they must be laughing all the while they are doing it. If only they realised how easy it would be to Islamify the West they could have done it 50 years ago.
The only way to remotely score even with these evil religious maniacs back would be to start strapping dynamite to ourselves and running in and out of mosques. But of course, the good old British Police / care of her majestys government / care of the liberal media, would soon have all us pesky non-muslims interned in our own gigantic Warsaw ghetto, until such a time came that we could be burned down and beheaded. (There's probably a government office right now, in pursuit of my I.P address, so I can serve a life sentence for my last paragraph).
No thanks. I'm out of this miserable country and away from it's depressing spineless and bone idle population, just as soon as I can find somewhere and I mean ANYWHERE in the world where the people OBJECT to being blown up by religious idiots.
I wish you all the very best of luck, but I totally and wholeheartedly give up! You may be rewarded for your efforts - but on the other hand, you could be publicly stoned to death on the latest prime time BBC reality show in 20 years time:
"Who Wants to Kill An Infidel."
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 5, 2007 23:01:27 GMT
Old news maybe and I don't know where YouGov get these drooling articles from BBC grandad and terrorist sicophant John Humphreys, but just listen to him drone on in what is a transparent attempt to repay Hamas for their alleged involvement in securing the release of Alan Nazi Johnston. www.yougov.com/interactive/humphrysMain.asp?aId=5268&jID=3&sID=5&pID=&wId=0&UID=But just read the loaded questions Humphrey's 'asks' of us, like some ancient english schoolteacher in front of a class full of 6 year olds. "What is your view? Do you think that Hamas should be recognised as a legitimate force in Palestinian politics or not? Has its behaviour over the release of Alan Johnston affected your view on this question, or not? Do you think it is hypocritical of the West to preach democracy and then refuse to accept the result of an election or do you think it legitimate for the West to refuse to deal with a group that does not accept that Israel should exist? Do you think Tony Blair can do nay good in his new job, or not? And how do you think Gordon Brown should deal with these issues?" By the way, members of this forum could do some good by joining YouGov and taking part in their lefty infested opinion polls. The more anti-left that infiltrate this site, the less you should see skewed opinion results in various newspapers. www.yougov.com/interactive/humphrysMain.asp?aId=5268&jID=3&sID=5&pID=&wId=0&UID=
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 3, 2007 17:16:41 GMT
A.L. that's a very astute analysis of lefty morality. What's sad though is the ultimate lefty doesn't believe himself as left wing at all. Just as no-one would ever admit to not having a sense of humour, so the lefty would never admit to being politically correct.
In further detail I'd say that British lefties (America too possibly) are predominantly middle class. They can afford to take up so much of their lives on other people's issues because they have so few to contend with themselves. Living lives of relative financial and social comfort, they suffer from that Orwellian guilt complex where they feel duty bound to advertise the plight of the 'needy' in an attempt to lance their own guilt. Unfortunately they always do so through highly paid public office positions - they practically get rich promoting the poor - make it a career even.
However, the double standards they live are disgusting. They condemn drug trafficking, while being partial to a few lines at the weekend. They bleat on about environmental issues while driving 4 wheel vehicles. They preach multi-culturalism and free education while living in all white communities and employing predominantly white University graduates. They are opposed to capitalism, yet live in expensive homes crammed with possessions.
This is a class system who's entire aim in life is self-perpetuity and self-gratification regardless of who reaps the cost.
And only until the middle classes themselves start reaping the cost of their own rabid teenage politics will this country start to change for the better.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 4, 2007 17:39:18 GMT
"Contact the BBC and demand more balanced coverage in its reporting of the Middle East."
This unfortunately is the very problem as we all know. Al Beeb are so lawless and agenda driven, no contact in the world will get them to admit the truth.
I still maintain the only way to end the BBC is to kill off the licence fee no matter how long it takes.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 8, 2007 23:04:43 GMT
Unfortunately getting Alan to sing about the true barbarianism of his captors is a missed opportunity. In time, after he starts to tow the BBC line again, and after his feathers have been puffed up constantly by BBC toads constantly hailing him as a hero, he'll forget about what animals they really are and find some new excuse to go back to Gaza and back their cause again.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 4, 2007 16:44:02 GMT
Some interesting comment on the biased BBC blogspot regarding Alan Nazi Johnston
Jonathan Boyd Hunt: Re: Alan Johnston kidnapping
I'm looking forward to the BBC asking Alan Johnston the obvious questions upon his release:
1) "Do you recant anything you said in the video?"
2) "Did you say anything in the video that you don't believe to be true?"
3) "What did you say in the video that you would not have said, had you not been fearful of losing your life?"
Of course, the only problem with this scenario is to suggest for one minute that the BBC would ever dare pose a direct question about themselves. Expect Johnstones rhetoric upon his inevitable release to be one of typical BBC management obfuscation. The question of his allegiance to terrorists will be swept under the BBC shagpile and his Palestinian soapboxing will resume as normal.
By the way, does anyone else find the endless sympathy and concern for Johnston's safety boring and mawkish? Talk about lay it on thick. The BBC clearly don't have much faith in their own reporting if they seriously think that the Palestinians would kill one of their most important media mouthpieces.
The bugger will be back, I have 100% faith in that. Fret not BBC hacks. He's merely being briefed on what the BBCs journalistic output should be for the coming season.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 4, 2007 16:22:07 GMT
Brilliant article from the only sane newspaper in the UK.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 1, 2007 9:06:16 GMT
news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070601/ap_on_re_mi_ea/palestinians_kidnapped_journalistThe report states: Johnston looked fit and calm during the three minutes he spoke. "My captors have treated me very well, they've fed me well, there has been no violence towards me at all and I am in good health," he said in his opening remarks — then launched into a diatribe against Israel and British Mideast policy. "In three years here in the Palestinian territories I witnessed the huge suffering of the Palestinian people, and my message is that the suffering is continuing and it is unacceptable," he said, blaming Israel. Sounds like a fake to me. All they've done is take one of Johnson's old news reports from the BBC and slapped Arabic subtitles on it.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Apr 29, 2007 0:53:23 GMT
So what was the name of Johnstone's cat?
Abdul?
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Apr 27, 2007 0:24:19 GMT
I have no sympathy for Alan Johnstone. Partisan to the Palestinian cause, like so many other BBC hacks, he is living proof that liberals have such a self-important opinion of their politics they actually believe they can wander round the Gaza strip untouched because 'They are on THEIR side.'
In his case, he over estimated his value to the Palestinians and under-estimated their savagery.
Two things can happen here. Both bad for the British people.
1) They will kill him and the BBC will pass it off as an Israeli plot, or merely point the finger at an insignificant Palestinian extremist group that aren't like all the nice, kitten soft PROPER Palestinians. Then return to normal BBC programing of promoting the cause of Islam.
2) They bring him back and we never hear the last of how well they treated him, what heroes they are, how Israel is to blame etc.
We can only hope the BBC send a replacement to Gaza ASAP. But being the spineless cowards these armchair crusaders are, I doubt there will be any takers.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 21, 2006 23:48:50 GMT
Just as I always suspected about Reuters. A corporation bursting at the seams with hacks, who then farm out their information to more hacks worldwide.
The blind leading the blind if ever there was one.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 1, 2007 14:55:32 GMT
How about erecting a billboard in Piccadilly Circus with a huge picture of the BBC Circus standing in the Middle East with the voting choices:
REPORTERS
COLLABORATERS
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Apr 27, 2007 0:50:29 GMT
Amnesty, Animal Rightist, Women's Liberation Groups et al are unfortunately also members of the "It's only important if we say so" paternity of this great nation. How many of the groups mentioned will cite the nations of Islam in their attacks. None of them.
Blessed are the minorities for their freedom is infinite.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 1, 2007 0:14:56 GMT
Does the BBC charter have an entry on this Religion and Ethics page by the way? Ethics would be a bit of a stretch though.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 30, 2007 23:50:24 GMT
That is a perfect example of the BBC Jew Hating remit. Has anyone forwarded this to the relevant 'complaints department' of the BBC. I would so love to hear their academic bullshit excuse for what is a clear case of biased semantics.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 21, 2006 23:53:58 GMT
Any chance of posting the hacks name who filed this report. Probably not listed I'll bet. I occasionally see a hacks name beneath the articles written by the BBC's ministry of disinformation but rarely against articles where they KNOW people will e-mail them.
But SOMEBODY writes these articles. Who? Somebody sits there with a rock solid mind to intentionally and deliberately avoiding such obvious facts. Who?
Anyone who can post the names of the hacks that make up the BBC ministry of disinformation newsdesk please post their e-mail addresses, as I would so enjoy asking them directly what the fu** they think they are doing?
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 20, 2006 22:51:46 GMT
Am I only the one who thought the news was just a vehicle to tell us what Reuters considers as 'going on in the world'. Why do we need anyone to commentate 16 different sides of ANYTHING in the news?
Horrocks overplaying his hand because he assumes he is as important to BBC viewers as he is to himself.
Horrocks - get this, the news is just a chance to get the dinner on before Eastenders. Nothing else!
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 30, 2007 23:26:30 GMT
"Alan 'extended holiday on full pay' Johnston"
Brilliant!
Just read on Melanie Philips site that the Beeb employed a member of Hamas to do their villanous bidding for them in getting Alan Partisan Johnston freed. Of course, the moment they were caught, they did the usual BBC press release obfuscation they are so brilliant at.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Apr 27, 2007 0:44:49 GMT
Who would you like to nominate for the top slot of most biased, Islam obsessed BBC Journo. I vote none other than AWOL journalist:
Alan Johnstone.
Would be nice to have a proper list of these parasites so we can discount every news item they are part of and know who the enemy truly are.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on May 27, 2007 19:28:41 GMT
I would have thought the more likely reason that other stations take no interest in exposing the BBC for what they are are twofold.
Firstly, almost every single TV station in Britain is in some small way guilty of similar pro-muslim and anti British bias, although it's marginal compared to the BBC's output.
Secondly - and most importantly - birds of a feather... The same people who work at ITV, Sky, C5 are all the same people who went to the same universities, did the same media studies degree and have the same connections and the same outlook, views and opinions. TV producers don't attack other TV producers for the simple fact that you don't rat on your friends!
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 11, 2007 14:18:57 GMT
And what makes it doubly funny is that the BBCs print version - The Guardian - also published the photos. Morons.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 20, 2006 20:20:20 GMT
I've never listened to James O'Brien and after reading his pompous, juvenile responses to your e-mails, I never would. The question of how someone with such a narrow intellect and shallow wit ever got a job at LBC isn't worth asking, because that would automatically suggest that LBC has a standard. Of which it clearly does not.
The beauty of your replies Teddy Bear, is their clarity and intelligence. I think they must have stung O Brien on more levels than you credit him for. The fact that there is someone more intelligent out there than himself (although his own intellect is clearly self-delusional), of which he cannot shoot down with choice words and the flick of a switch, must have irked him to the point of despair.
"Oh go away now you silly little man"
If that is the breadth of his intellect and the only defense for his brazen bigotry that has been made apparant in his replies - let alone his radio show - I pity his listeners and his children, let alone his education.
"Toodle pip"? Seriously. Is there anyone in the world outside of Dick Van Dyke that would ever use this expression even in jest let alone mockery.
Another Z list disc jockey desperately trying to avoid his deserved position on the scrap heap of has-beens, of which - by the sounds of it - will be coming quite soon.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 8, 2007 21:53:11 GMT
People like iftikhar are a prime example of the sort of people that the BBC have progressively hatched into this cuckoo nest that is British society. They speak the same Alice in Wonderland rhetoric they have been taught by their teachers at the BBC, meanwhile harbouring a sinister grudge against Westerners, taught by their own nefarious religion. They prey upon the gullibility and 'charity' of liberal do gooders, as a means to exploit what is on offer for their own cause.
People like him will only be happy when the primary language taught in schools is their own. And I can quite gratefully say I would fight an on the street civil war to stop this type of scum from 'intergrating' themselves into our society with the aim of intergrating us OUT of it.
Iftikhar go and preach your nonsense on the BBC 'Have Your Say' board, you'll be most welcome their. Failing that, why don't you just apply to your local government for a grant to preach your views further to us. They're handing out blank cheques to people like you.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 4, 2007 18:16:42 GMT
Does anyone else feel that the comments section of You Tube is proof that evolution is now moving backwards.
Look for any vaguely slapstick or desperately unfunny amateur submission on You Tube and read the comments. It makes you wonder if the people that smack this stuff onto their keyboards still walk around in mammoth skins wielding spears.
God help us.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 2, 2007 23:58:29 GMT
Trust me. Since taking over from NTL they have ploughed the service into the ground.
Got a 4MB connection that barely rakes 1MB. They overcharged me 4 times the going rate for it! Gave me an old telephone number that belonged to a car tow company, so getting calls in the small hours. Customer support are all idiots.
Avoid! Avoid! AVOID!!
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 4, 2007 17:35:51 GMT
If they're not laughing now, they certainly will in the future. Hopefully people will look back and say, "So it's alright to employ people just because they are black, but totally wrong to employ people just because they are white. Ha ha ha!"
If I was black, I would hope I was being employed because I had skills and character. I would be highly insulted if I was being employed just to fulfil some government charter.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Aug 1, 2007 23:56:37 GMT
You've hit the nail on the head Teddy and the 'trough' is the best description for it. Of course all the top management will be nepotistic white upper middle class, champagne socialist types.
This is just a repeat of the millenium dome scam. All that happens is that public funds are released to public schoolboys and girls to hire each other to do nothing other than line their own pockets and promote their politics.
Only these social elitists can actually make money from silly job titles they make up and hand out to each other. It wouldn't be funny even if it was a Monty Python Sketch - and it's pretty bloody close.
"Oh hello Jeremy, I've got my hands on the government pot again, get in while you can chummy, there's lots of free loot. Skills? Don't be silly man. Skills are for the riff-raff. The only skills you need is to dream up a silly management title."
"Ethnic Diversity Inclusion Projects Oversee-er Chief Manager and Char Wallah?"
"That's perfect! I don't know what it means but it sounds very lucrative. Here have a six figure pay check and bonus."
Seriously. The sooner we finacially suffocate the entire upper middle classes, the sooner they'll have to go out and get real jobs.
|
|