|
Post by indikit on Jul 2, 2007 19:55:42 GMT
As I've always thought, it's the powerful middle class western elite that promote the causes of Islam fantatics that need smashing rather than the Islam fantatics themselves.
The swiftest, easiest and surest way to bring the ruling class to their knees and detour them immediately from their sanctimonious rightsist causes is to quite simply - cut off their wages. It's money that these people lust after first, way above any rightsist causes that they lust after. As is the case of the BBC and many state funded organizations in the UK, these people are making money from the rightsist causes they promote. Documentaries, news reports et al. It's in their vested interests that the causes they champion are never resolved. If they were, they'd soon abandon them in favour of a new cause.
It does make me come over with a warm glow, when I think about what would happen to the middle class elite if they achieved their goals of Islamifying the UK. They would be immediately subjugated to it's religion and all the bleating in the world about new minority causes they want to promote would be silenced swiftly and effectively.
unfortunately, the media and political elite are so blinkered, so short term in their thinking, they would never question for one minute what the true results of their crusading would bring to themselves and their own families.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 1, 2007 14:48:21 GMT
That is most likely it. But if our future is in their hands then we are still in BIG trouble.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jul 1, 2007 0:16:46 GMT
I didn't want to keep bugging her LOL.
Perhaps she meant those in high powered positions that are not in politics.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 30, 2007 23:37:07 GMT
I just sent an e-mail of support to Melanie Phillips and asked her a single question. Amazingly she responded within 5 minutes and it was gone midnight on a Saturday night. The woman is super human! Here's my question and her answer: Melanie, After reading your site for many months now, I have come to the conclusion that you are the only sane person left in journalism in the UK. In fact, I'm wondering if you are the only sane person left in Britain period. Of all the questions I would love to ask you, I only have one: Since the publication of your book "Londonistan" have you seen even the remotest change in political and media attitudes toward this relentless (and seemingly subconscious) pro-Islam, western-hating fervor. Melanie Phillips: Thanks a lot for your kind encouragement which is hugely appreciated. At a political level -- no movement, I'm afraid, except further in the wrong direction. Lower down, at an official level, some movement in the right direction -- not enough, but more and more people with scales rapidly falling from their eyes. On the left, considerable and growing unease under the surface about the Islamist threat to their shibboleths. Among the general population, huge concern and fury about British Islamism and its appeasement. However, both on the left and right, a continuing failure to grasp the full dimensions and nature of the Islamic jihad globally, and in particular the position of Israel. We can only hope that sanity will prevail in time. Huge thanks again for your support. Best wishes Melanie Please see my articles and regularly updated Diary on my website, www.melaniephillips.comI'm not completely sure of what she means by 'official level'. Anyone care to elaborate?
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Oct 18, 2007 9:38:24 GMT
Not very topical as this poll was taken in 2005 but still completely relevant. How I love reading the watered down "cherry picked" quotations at the side, where not even the BBC could spin positivity in an overall negative response. Should the Licence Fee Be Scrapped? news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/4330060.stm
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Oct 18, 2007 4:41:19 GMT
Well I couldn't resist commenting. I felt over-joyed at the news. Of course it will no doubt create a recession among the bohemian restaurants in Islington, and the columbian drug trade is going to see a severe drop in cocaine profits as well as property prices of big, posh houses in the home counties dropping steeply.
But never mind, Mummy and Daddy have DEEP pockets and as johnbull correctly points out, they won't have trouble finding new jobs. The entirety of the British media is one gigantic middle-class fremasons outfit.
Yes, you won't have to fret about finding a job on the merits of your own abilities. Just wave your ex-BBC credentials in their face and be sure to name drop all your mutual ex-university chums. Film-making skills? What's that? No, no, I just like to gob off loudly about multi-culturalism.
Wankers.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Oct 17, 2007 10:58:33 GMT
Can I just take this opportunity to pour salt onto the wounds of the 10% of the BBC who are about to lose their jobs, by saying how much pleasure and delight it gives me to know that 10% of those cowering, lefty simpletons are going to be pulled from the over-funded teats of BBC and thrown back into the real world.
Still not to worry, as I'm sure Mummy and Daddy, and all your 'meeja' uni nepotistic friends will help you secure a fresh job elsewhere in telly land where you can infect the British public further with your own unique brand of talentless, uncreative, unimaginative visual swill.
As 10% of the workforce will be shed, does this mean that the BBC will be 10% more shit than usual? Not a bit of it. Because we all know the first in the firing line will be all the heterosexual white males or those who dared to show even the remotest of conservative attitudes, or those who posses any ounce of skill or talent (if that's even possible) within the BBC.
All the bunny huggers, terrorist sympathizers and ethnic 'majorities' will of course find themselves in full receipt of their publicly funded "employment benefits", where they are free to propagate their malign politics on behalf of any minority group with an axe to grind.
Which is good news again, because with these job losses, the BBC will be plunged back into it's totalitarian dark age as they reinforce their lefty mindset even harder, and in a few more years we can look forward to the public turning against them even more and the next 10% being booted out on their fat, lazy, overpaid, self-deluded arses.
Here's to the next 90%!!! Champagne all round!!!
As a footnote, how many of these spoiled, arrogant middle-class tosspots remaining do you think will continue to bash their hippy agendas onto us knowing that as a result they could lose their fat wage packets and those gloriously large houses in their all white home counties neighbourhoods in the next few years?
I'll give you a clue...It has a zero in it...
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Dec 20, 2006 20:25:33 GMT
"admiral in charge of the entire fleet, not the ship's captain"
And there's us thinking it's just a telly station.
Silly us, it's a f***ing Armada!
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 30, 2007 23:04:41 GMT
The man says himself in his own blog that:
"I do reply to all complaints as long as they aren’t abusive."
Dare I be so cyncial as to suggest that I find that HIGHLY unlikely. Considering they routinely wipe my comments off the Have Your Say board which are never offensive, shouldn't Alistair really be saying:
"I do reply to all complaints as long as they are complaints that aren't right."
As he goes into so much trouble to tell us about how he intends to respond to a complaint which has absolutely no point at all, can I ask if anyone has ever recieved a response from the man about a complaint which actually has a point?
Either way, I'll be writing my next complaint to him to see if he truly does respond to all complaints. I'd say he's put him himself between a roc k and a hard place with that admission.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 1, 2007 7:09:26 GMT
For anyone left in the real world who actually thinks the BBC would ever listen to a complaint that opposed their own opinion of themselves, then just check out the Guide to Posting page on the editors comments pages.
It seems the BBC regard complaints about them in the following way:
One person complaining = A Nutter Lots of People Complaining = A Concerted Lobbying Attempt
So remember, if lots of people agree about something and put it to the BBC, they will write you off as organized conspirators and censor you.
So when opposing the BBC on any comments placed in the editorial page do so on a marginal point that only YOU are likely to uphold. The BBC are totally for free speech as long as it's only one person doing the talking.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 1, 2007 6:08:41 GMT
I've also just noticed that Fran Unsworth's article on that page is the only one with the Opinions switched off. Now why is that? We dare not criticize the Beebs nearest and dearest Alan Johnstone?
Personally, I always publish my 'have Your Say Comments' here as well as on their site, because I know this is the only place where they will remain.
|
|
|
Post by indikit on May 28, 2007 18:06:53 GMT
While you're at it. Look at Peter Barons face as the next one down. It looks like it's just been slapped. Of course that wouldn't have been the aim. The aim of the photo would have been: "I care. I listen. Caring and listening in a thoughtful intelligent way." Whatever these people try they can't help but come off looking like anything other than condescending christian missionaries staring at natives and thinking "well soon have you worshipping the BBC god." Alistair Burnetts picture looks like he's just been caught shoplifting. His intent would have been: "I am Alistair Burnett. Direct and trustworthy." I have no idea what Mark Barlex was attempting with his picture but at least his looks honest. "I am a smug twat. Hit me."
|
|
|
Post by indikit on May 28, 2007 17:59:41 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/Take a look at Fran Unsworth staring down at you like a school mistress at the top of the editors comments pages. Isn't she just the embodiment of liberal arrogance that dominates the BBC. In her article she gives the New York Times a good telling off for being so naughty as to suggest Alan Johnstone was a little bit partisan when it came to Palestine and that the BBC thought they were untouchable because of the propoganda work they have done for them. I just don't get these people. Has she not figured it out - it's called Tit-for-Tat. This was probably the best chance the NYT have had in a long time to take a swipe at the BBCs rabid anti-americanism, and she reacts in the typical pompous BBC management way. How dare they criticize US! But boy, just look at that face. How many cowering, media studies uni grads, desperate to impress BBC heads with their multi-cultural, pro-palestinian urges have had their waters turned to ice from one disdainful look from such a hard faced cow in editorial meetings. So what precautions did the BBC take before sending Alan Johnstone back home to the Gaza Strip? They probably listened to their own news reports and actually believed them. Frans picture just says "Talk to the hand coz the face 'aint listening." Or whatever the BBC corporate varient would be: "Talk to my P.A Jeremy, because my department is extremely busy."
|
|
|
Post by indikit on Jun 30, 2007 23:23:27 GMT
Melanie Philips seems to be the only sane person left in Journalism. I can't get enough of her site. I just wish her articles were more prominent across the internet.
|
|